Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What does everyone think of the Peruvian 3-fingered mummy called Maria, has 23 chromasomes, which was preserved in white cadmium chloride and analysed by Russian scientists for Gaia TV.
Scientists also found Maria was embalmed in a cadmium chloride white powder, the antibacterial effect of which has preserved Maria to this day.
...
Aside from Maria, Professor Korotkov witnessed four more mummies in Peru, all male with a DNA of 23 pairs of chromosomes, like us. However, “they appear human but they are not. Their anatomic structure is different” says Korotkov.
X-ray and computer tomography showed Maria has a very different rib structure to that of humans. Keel-shaped in the upper part with a handful of semicircular ribs, the cage protects the creature’s internal organs, which do resemble those of humans.
Looking at the skull sideways on, it appears to be like other ET profiles we have seen sketched and illustrated. Very small nose, yet the fingers remind me of a preying mantis which others have described as one type of alien seen in abductions.
The articles are trying to make Professor Korotkov out as a slightly weird and unreliable scientist.
My gut tells me this is not an alien, but I would have thought someone would have pointed out the similarity to a monkey or sloth if it was something like that. There are multiple indicators on not being human and so maybe it is an animal from the jungle?
I am sorry if this gives offense, but don't trust anything out of Russia. They have a pseudo science industry there.
I know nothing about this case, but it sounds like the "starchild" thing all over again, which turned out to be just the skull of some poor kid who dies of a disease.
Just like the owl monkey/sealand skull, this may well be a known animal. I dont think just because the Russians are involved it makes it any less valid science as the Russians have done some good science in the past. What makes you (cachibatches) think they are unreliable for science? But, yes it might be like the starchild and with Gaia TV being involved somewhere may give it a funny smell.
The odd things are:
a) It looks quite like a human skeleton we have seen before from other burial mounds
b) It has 3 fingers/toes which is non-human
c) It has a strange elongated head
d) it has small nose similat to some aliens we have seen
So we look at the different stories of this reported and find out if there are any from credible sources.
The Black Vault has a forum item about it, but apart from that and the reported German University involvement, I do not see any other really good source. There are a couple of minor archeology sites reporting it but they all seem to have the same information which makes me think it comes from one source originally. Thats not good for credibility.
So, can anyone do a search and find some good information?
Just like the owl monkey/sealand skull, this may well be a known animal. I dont think just because the Russians are involved it makes it any less valid science as the Russians have done some good science in the past. What makes you (cachibatches) think they are unreliable for science? But, yes it might be like the starchild and with Gaia TV being involved somewhere may give it a funny smell.
The odd things are:
a) It looks quite like a human skeleton we have seen before from other burial mounds
b) It has 3 fingers/toes which is non-human
c) It has a strange elongated head
d) it has small nose similat to some aliens we have seen
So we look at the different stories of this reported and find out if there are any from credible sources.
The Black Vault has a forum item about it, but apart from that and the reported German University involvement, I do not see any other really good source. There are a couple of minor archeology sites reporting it but they all seem to have the same information which makes me think it comes from one source originally. Thats not good for credibility.
So, can anyone do a search and find some good information?
Literally hundreds of proven pseudo science stories that have come out of Russia in the last two decades sold as serious science.
There is also the guy who claims he was the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film, yet Gimlin claims it was real. Personally, at the risk of starting another discussion about this, Patti looks too human to me. Loads of hoaxers out there not just Russian officials. Governments of all shapes and sizes jump on the bandwagon, information and disinformation is everywhere. Rick Dolty is a self-confessed disinfo agent too.
There is also the guy who claims he was the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film, yet Gimlin claims it was real. Personally, at the risk of starting another discussion about this, Patti looks too human to me. Loads of hoaxers out there not just Russian officials. Governments of all shapes and sizes jump on the bandwagon, information and disinformation is everywhere. Rick Dolty is a self-confessed disinfo agent too.
Yeah..please read at least the second article I posted. Russia is a hotbed of pseudo-science, some of it government sanctioned. It is not controversial in the least, and if you were interested, you could spend half and hour of so researching it. If not, believe as you like. I led you to the water.
Yeah..please read at least the second article I posted. Russia is a hotbed of pseudo-science, some of it government sanctioned. It is not controversial in the least, and if you were interested, you could spend half and hour of so researching it. If not, believe as you like. I led you to the water.
By the way, it is Richard Doty not Dolty who I referred to earlier.
It really isn't a matter of believing it or not. I just think that anyone saying one country is a 'bad guy' for whatever reason is believing all the stuff pumped out by all the corrupted media. Do you honestly think individual scientists in Russia or any other country want to do bad science? They live and die career-wise by their reputations and published papers just like every scientist does. However, they might be used by governments to send a message which is convenient and which promotes an agenda.
As an example I can point to NASA scientists who cannot decide the strength of the wind on Mars. I am absolutely positive they know the strength, but they have to publish articles saying it is both strong and weak so that folks can point to those articles to give their arguments credibility. To you and me, it would seem like the NASA scientists are incompetent and do not know about the wind, but other forces insist they show that face to the world. The rovers Opportunity and Spirit used to have wind 'cleaning events' which used to mysteriously clean their solar panels after they got so dusty they could not receive enough sunlight to charge their batteries. Yet the wind is not strong enough to move 5mm spherules together into piles. Really? Which scientist do you know who would grind down a rock formation which looked exactly like a chrinoid which was possible evidence for ancient life on Mars?
So, the point I am making is that every scientist who works for governments across the world wants to keep their job so they do what is required. Russian, Chinese, American, whatever. Whether you call it pseudo-science or not, they are directed by their employer.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
