Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Strange how Kammler disappeared somewhere. Probably 'spirited away' by a government only to pop up under a different name (with an accent?) in a different country. These are the kind of secret documents we need to know about, now that all of them have died a natural death.
Quote:
Still, some UFO conspiracy theorists believe U.S. forces captured Nazi scientists—and even Kammler himself—and put them to work on developing Die Glocke’s anti-gravity technology. As the legend goes, this culminated in the so-called Kecksburg Incident, when a bell-shaped UFO allegedly crashed outside Kecksburg, Pennsylvania in December 1965.
Does any of this check out? It’s extraordinarily unlikely. For starters, there’s one obvious hole in the theory: If the U.S. really had access to anti-gravity technology, then where are the anti-gravity planes?
He must know something I dont because I see reports of anti-grav technology flying about almost every day in recent times. We can debate where it comes from, but it is fairly obvious there are craft like this in the air.
many of the SS officials purportedly involved in the “secret UFO program” weren’t in any position to actually run it, and NASA attributes the Kecksburg Incident to the reentry of a failed Soviet Venus probe, Cosmos 96.
So, thats the 'official' explanation ? Witnesses reports it shooting flames and changing course before crashing. Downed satellites dont do that.
Interesting, but did you actually watch the video the article is talking about?
The documentary admits there is ZERO proof of the Nazi Anti-Gravity machine, but a whole lot of speculation. At one point, the documentary even calls all such claims "nonsense."
The stuff about real-world anti-gravity research by NASA, BAE Systems UK, and various Russian industries is interesting.
We grossly misjudged the Nazi atomic bomb program. We thought they were extremely close to completion, when in reality, they were barely in the preliminary stages.
So why should anyone believe they were close to any type of cutting edge technology?
We grossly misjudged the Nazi atomic bomb program. We thought they were extremely close to completion, when in reality, they were barely in the preliminary stages.
So why should anyone believe they were close to any type of cutting edge technology?
We grossly misjudged the Nazi atomic bomb program. We thought they were extremely close to completion, when in reality, they were barely in the preliminary stages.
So why should anyone believe they were close to any type of cutting edge technology?
Not so. The British bombed a heavy water plant in the war. Unless of course you are going to maintain that heavy water was going to be used by all the Nazis to get all the creases out of their uniforms?
Interesting, but did you actually watch the video the article is talking about?
The documentary admits there is ZERO proof of the Nazi Anti-Gravity machine, but a whole lot of speculation. At one point, the documentary even calls all such claims "nonsense."
The stuff about real-world anti-gravity research by NASA, BAE Systems UK, and various Russian industries is interesting.
If anti gravity could be achieved, it would be a tremendous technological breakthrough in aviation. So far all efforts have failed, as gravity appears to be an intrinsic property of the universe.
So far all efforts have failed, as gravity appears to be an intrinsic property of the universe.
And you know this how?
How do you know and what makes you want to say this as if it is fact - which it is NOT?
You are one of the first to question stuff we say, but then you make statements like this which are clearly not correct - since we have craft whizzing around which defy gravity and there are patents which propose solutions to overcoming gravity.
If one of these craft is proven to be flying with anti-gravity propulsion I believe it's safe to say that that revelation will also prove that it was not manufactured on Earth.
So far all efforts have failed, as gravity appears to be an intrinsic property of the universe.
Gravity is definitely an intrinsic force in the universe. But that doesn't necessarily mean it can't be manipulated.
"Anti-gravity" itself is a bit of a misnomer, since I don't know of anyone who seriously thinks you can just "turn off" gravity. But if physicists are right, basically anything with mass causes a "depression" in space-time, and the thing with mass naturally "falls" into the depression. (Your graphic has a nice artistic representation of the concept.)
But some physicists think that there might be a way to "trick" an object with mass into "falling" in the wrong direction. So gravity isn't turned off. The object isn't floating. It is simply "falling" in a manipulated direction.
Can we do it yet? Not as far as I know. But some physicists who are way smarter than me seem to think it's possible.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
