Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-19-2012, 09:34 AM
 
8,276 posts, read 11,908,519 times
Reputation: 10080

Advertisements

Directed more at suburbanites, obviously..

Better public schools? Bigger lawns? Others???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-19-2012, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Beavercreek, OH
2,194 posts, read 3,847,469 times
Reputation: 2353
Hi MassVt--

As a downtown resident who will pick up and move to the suburbs the minute I graduate and start making money, I think I can answer.

1) Public schools - if I ever have a kid, the day he turns five, I want him (her?) in a good school. In this economy, private school is likely a stretch to afford, if not out of reach altogether. So, locating where there's a good school district will become an absolute necessity. Because schools constitute the lion's share of property taxes - might as well get your money's worth.

2) Yard space (or space in general) - I'm tired of having to turn down my stereo set after about 8 PM.

3) City taxes - Between property taxes and city income taxes, it's simply too expensive to live here. And I don't get the level of service or amenities that justify those taxes. Ohio is weird in this respect - if you live in an unincorporated township, the township can't levy any form of income tax (while cities can). Consequently, taxes are far, far lower in townships - and there's tons of development in the far-flung areas.

4) Noise - Ties back in #2 somewhat, but the endless traffic, horns, helicopters, etc. bugs me.

5) Safety - There's been two burglaries on my block in the past month. 'Nuff said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2012, 11:10 AM
 
8,276 posts, read 11,908,519 times
Reputation: 10080
Quote:
Originally Posted by hensleya1 View Post
Hi MassVt--

As a downtown resident who will pick up and move to the suburbs the minute I graduate and start making money, I think I can answer.

1) Public schools - if I ever have a kid, the day he turns five, I want him (her?) in a good school. In this economy, private school is likely a stretch to afford, if not out of reach altogether. So, locating where there's a good school district will become an absolute necessity. Because schools constitute the lion's share of property taxes - might as well get your money's worth.

2) Yard space (or space in general) - I'm tired of having to turn down my stereo set after about 8 PM.

3) City taxes - Between property taxes and city income taxes, it's simply too expensive to live here. And I don't get the level of service or amenities that justify those taxes. Ohio is weird in this respect - if you live in an unincorporated township, the township can't levy any form of income tax (while cities can). Consequently, taxes are far, far lower in townships - and there's tons of development in the far-flung areas.

4) Noise - Ties back in #2 somewhat, but the endless traffic, horns, helicopters, etc. bugs me.

5) Safety - There's been two burglaries on my block in the past month. 'Nuff said.
Hi Hensleya,

Good points, but as far as stereo noise is concerned, you really shouldn't have the stereo blaring past 8 anyway, city or suburb. That's the whole point of using ear plugs/head phones, and the whole point of being a good neighbor.

I also feel that the size of the city might influence someone's choices. In a small/mid-sized city, you're more apt to find better schools/more space than in larger cities, so perhaps you might still consider city living. But in very large metro areas, this is less true..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2012, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,948 posts, read 75,144,160 times
Reputation: 66884
Quote:
Originally Posted by MassVt View Post
I also feel that the size of the city might influence someone's choices. In a small/mid-sized city, you're more apt to find better schools/more space than in larger cities, so perhaps you might still consider city living. But in very large metro areas, this is less true..
Good point. I was happy as a clam living in Cincinnati, but I do not want to live in Philadelphia, income taxes notwithstanding. Philadelphia is a kazillion times more dense than Cincinnati, and I prefer not living on top of other people.

The city's income taxes, though, were the reason we decided to live in the suburbs; my late spouse was self-employed, and the difference between paying around 4 percent in income taxes and 1 percent was quite significant to him. I work in Philadelphia, but still pay a lower income tax rate than a resident, and pay no income taxes at all to my home municipality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2012, 11:34 AM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,508,240 times
Reputation: 3714
What would be the point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2012, 11:52 AM
 
5,546 posts, read 6,868,827 times
Reputation: 3826
What I don't get is the bigger lawns. If there were lawns in the city, wouldn't you just be transforming the city into the suburbs? The premise is interesting, but I would think the following would be relevant:

1. Schools - This is mentioned.
2. Lower Crime - Assume that neighborhoods in cities that are currently plagued with crime get all cleaned up.
3. Pricetag - Assume that all those "safe" neighborhoods with good schools are as reasonably priced as the surrounding suburbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2012, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJNEOA View Post
What I don't get is the bigger lawns. If there were lawns in the city, wouldn't you just be transforming the city into the suburbs? The premise is interesting, but I would think the following would be relevant:

1. Schools - This is mentioned.
2. Lower Crime - Assume that neighborhoods in cities that are currently plagued with crime get all cleaned up.
3. Pricetag - Assume that all those "safe" neighborhoods with good schools are as reasonably priced as the surrounding suburbs.
#3 in particular is a HUGE assumption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2012, 12:05 PM
 
5,546 posts, read 6,868,827 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
#3 in particular is a HUGE assumption.
True. To make the concept reasonable, I suppose pricetag would vary no differently than suburban neighborhoods with good schools and low crime. Location and desirability would cause the variance, just as it does in the burbs. The purpose of the assumption being that neighborhoods with good schools and low crime aren't so expensive that the middle class can't afford them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2012, 12:07 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,888,203 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by HandsUpThumbsDown View Post
What would be the point?

Agreed in a sense these amentities already exist, this would mean basically no delineation between urban and suburban environments and lead to less diversity for personal choice


Also nearly ALL cities already have such amentities witin their borders and some suburban areas have either the same issues and/or lack of space


I dont really understand the premis
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2012, 12:17 PM
 
8,276 posts, read 11,908,519 times
Reputation: 10080
It would have to be a group effort, and not just a family or two. I don't know too many people wo want to play the role of "urban pioneer" all by themselves..esp if the adventure fails to take hold and they become stuck with a property they can't unload quickly.

I should point out that some large cities do have "suburban-looking" parts; Boston, in particular has sections of Hyde Park and almost all of West Roxbury that could easily be mistaken for postwar suburbia. But you have to know where to look..

"What would be the point?"

Perhaps to cut down on car/gas usage, or even to cut down to one ( or no) car; better access to major cultural institutions ( museums, stadiums, parks, concerts, restaurants) that are still predominantly in city centers, taking advantage of public transit, perhaps put an end to never-ending sprawl, etc...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top