Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-28-2021, 06:10 PM
 
Location: West coast
5,281 posts, read 3,077,727 times
Reputation: 12275

Advertisements

We are on the water (a salt water bay place) and would like to own the tidal rights for our property.
They apparently expired when the original home owner died.
We bought from their estate.
My realtor didn’t know the answer.
I googled the heck out of it but could not find an answer.
It’s a pretty secluded area and I just want the rights for privacy and to do aqua culture.
I’d also wouldn’t like a mooring buoy planted in my back yard.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-28-2021, 08:16 PM
 
Location: Rochester, WA
14,486 posts, read 12,114,400 times
Reputation: 39058
If the previous landowner owned them, I’m not sure why the title to the tidelands did not transfer… They did on our beach property when we purchased it from our grandparents estate.

I would call a local title company and start there in asking this question…

I heard stories growing up about my grandfather going down and bidding on the courthouse steps for his tidal rights.

It is possible that they are now more closely controlled by the state than they used to be and not offered up for private ownership. Like water rights you don’t hear of them transferring with very many properties.

But if you look at the assessor maps online you can see that there are a few properties that extend beyond the water line.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2021, 09:14 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,211 posts, read 107,904,670 times
Reputation: 116153
Andy, I don't understand how you can have tidal rights in a region (the NW), where the tribes by law have the right to harvest shellfish in tidal zones across the board. Homeowner tidal rights would be illegal. Even if you somehow were able to get a document saying you had tidal rights, it would never hold up if challenged in court by Native shellfish harvesters.

You can't chase Native people off your tidal zone for exercising their treaty rights. Treaty rights are "the supreme law of the land", as characterized in Federal Indian Law, and shellfish harvesting from all tidal zones was specifically protected in US v. Washington. As to whether you could chase non-Natives off your tidal zone, I couldn't say. As you probably know, in CA all tidal zones are open to the public. I think WA has a similar law on the books, but I couldn't swear to it.

Last edited by Ruth4Truth; 03-01-2021 at 09:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2021, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Rochester, WA
14,486 posts, read 12,114,400 times
Reputation: 39058
It is true that Washington beaches are public and it is illegal to block anyone from crossing or being on the beach in front of your property… You can however of course limit access from the land to the beach through your property.

FWIW - You also don’t need to own the tidelands in order to anchor a buoy out in front of your property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2021, 11:24 AM
 
Location: Forest bathing
3,205 posts, read 2,485,925 times
Reputation: 7268
My grandparents owned waterfront property on Whidbey Island from 1963 until 1989. Their deed stated that they owned out to the lowest tidal mark. Most deeds said lowest mean tidal mark. They had a contract with Penn Cove mussel farms to lease their tidelands to grow mussels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2021, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Reno, Nevada, USA, Earth
1,169 posts, read 751,079 times
Reputation: 1559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana Holbrook View Post
It is true that Washington beaches are public and it is illegal to block anyone from crossing or being on the beach in front of your property… You can however of course limit access from the land to the beach through your property.

FWIW - You also don’t need to own the tidelands in order to anchor a buoy out in front of your property.
I think the concern was someone else placing a mooring buoy in front of the property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2021, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Rochester, WA
14,486 posts, read 12,114,400 times
Reputation: 39058
Quote:
Originally Posted by alaskaflyer View Post
I think the concern was someone else placing a mooring buoy in front of the property.

You're right... I see that now. I don't think there's anything that would prevent that. Anyone could come and anchor out front, anywhere they want. People usually *don't* do that if there's no reason to be there, but they could.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2021, 12:29 PM
 
Location: Rochester, WA
14,486 posts, read 12,114,400 times
Reputation: 39058
Quote:
Originally Posted by xPlorer48 View Post
My grandparents owned waterfront property on Whidbey Island from 1963 until 1989. Their deed stated that they owned out to the lowest tidal mark. Most deeds said lowest mean tidal mark. They had a contract with Penn Cove mussel farms to lease their tidelands to grow mussels.

Right... when I look at waterfront properties on Assessor site or on the MLS, the properties vary in how far out into the water they go. Some are at the mean HIGH water mark. Some extend out to the low water mark or beyond. It is not consistent. And while these lines are not surveys by any means, they're often off by half.... but I think they do indicate that some of these properties own the tidelands, and some do not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2021, 03:56 PM
 
Location: Reno, Nevada, USA, Earth
1,169 posts, read 751,079 times
Reputation: 1559
It sounds to me that a life estate may have been in force for the tidelands in question; either it was conveyed to the life tenant at the time of purchase by the state instead of using a more typical property interest, or it was the result of some legal action such as a lawsuit to resolve a conflict over property rights, probably decades ago.

A deed should describe who the remainderman is, whether it is the state (managed by DNR) or some other private party such as a corporation. If it is the state the chance to purchase is roughly nil, as it is now prohibited by state law to sell state tidelands.

As for owning tidelands subject to native treaties, the law is clear that both can be in force at the same time. You can own second class tidelands, but your ownership is subject to native rights to collect certain things at a certain percentage at certain times, and also - maybe - public trust doctrine allowing public access for movement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2021, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Near Sequim, WA
576 posts, read 2,260,925 times
Reputation: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by MechAndy View Post
We are on the water (a salt water bay place) and would like to own the tidal rights for our property.
They apparently expired when the original home owner died.
We bought from their estate.
My realtor didn’t know the answer.
I googled the heck out of it but could not find an answer.
It’s a pretty secluded area and I just want the rights for privacy and to do aqua culture.
I’d also wouldn’t like a mooring buoy planted in my back yard.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Hi Andy:

It’s my understanding that the tribe (S’Klallam) owns the tideland rights on the bay but I could be wrong and I’m not sure how much of an area this covers. It could just be the far end of the bay (down by the casino). You might give their administrative office a call or stop in there as you drive by. Another option would be to check with the Clallam County Assessors offiice (or Planning and Zoning). They might have a map they could pull up in their system to help you figure this out.

Last edited by Dendrite; 03-03-2021 at 07:35 PM.. Reason: Mis spelled word
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top