Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I’d say Nashville. I think Nashville is prone to extreme cold and heat. It reached 109 F in July a few years back, and that’s with humidity.
It is, but the heat doesn't seem out of place or that extreme for its latitude. Whereas the record cold does (same way the record heat in Melbourne seems over the top).
Some summers in Melbourne are a special kind of Hell....2009 ( the Black Saturday fires ) was a bad one with three consecutive days above 110f, then the record breaking day of the fires a week later ( 115.5f )
Jan 2014 also had a hot spell....four consecutive days above 107f !.
But in some years the temp fails to reach 100f .
Winters ( by Aussie standards ) are often bleak, gloomy and variable temp wise, with the frequent passage of cold fronts from west to east. And in dry and drought years, and with a blocking High in the Tasman Sea, there can be days on end of clear sunny skies even in mid winter. But the default patterns are cloudy, showery, bleak and gloomy....lol !
I have to say Melbourne because their winters are way warmer but Nashville got hotter summers. Melbourne climate will be much better with Nashville hotter summers and Nashville will be much better with Melbourne milder winters. Nashville ain't no joke in the winter, even if it's not bad as places like Chicago or any of those northern cities.
Melbourne. Better winters and much less humid in the summer.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.