Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-22-2017, 06:05 PM
 
144 posts, read 129,946 times
Reputation: 84

Advertisements

...I already work at the company?

I recently applied for an internal promotion at the company I work for. Previously, a committee would interview every internal candidate who applied, which dragged out the process. I work at a large corporation, so this meant 30-40 people were interviewing for only a couple of spots. This time, however, the head of our program stated that not everyone would receive an interview this time around.

Today, I was contacted by an internal recruiter who was impressed with my resume/work and wanted to set up an interview. While this sounds like it's good...is this normal? I thought that recruiters primarily try to bring in people from outside the company.

I've been on all sorts of interviews, but being contacted by an internal recruiter while I am already inside the walls of the company is a first.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-22-2017, 07:25 PM
 
2,407 posts, read 3,197,615 times
Reputation: 4346
There could be a couple of reasons for this. The department may have wanted the recruiter to manage the process. The company may have wanted to cover their bases if one of the people who wanted to interview was not invited. Since they already stated they would not interview every candidate, I wouldn't read anything into the recruiter contacting you and be happy you are being interviewed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2017, 07:23 AM
 
Location: Southern California
12,713 posts, read 15,574,057 times
Reputation: 35512
Completely normal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2017, 08:15 AM
 
13,011 posts, read 13,076,690 times
Reputation: 21914
Sounds normal to me. One of the recruiter's job responsibilities is to set up interviews, and that is what they are doing.

You can decline the interview, but you were the person who applied for the job in the first place, so that doesn't make much sense.

Speaking as a hiring manager, that is how I have typically seen it done. Our HR recruiting staff assists me in scheduling interviews. It is an admin function that I appreciate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2017, 07:23 AM
 
1,454 posts, read 1,948,566 times
Reputation: 1254
yes, quite normal, in my experience. for my company, we have thousands of internal HR people, a lot of those are in recruiting roles and they handle the process the same way for internal/external candidates. There's a phone interview, then cuts are made before the next round - which could be one on one or panel interviews.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2017, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Westchester County, NY
1,602 posts, read 1,920,655 times
Reputation: 1548
Completely normal as others have said. I think people always associate the title "recruiter" with someone external trying to get you into a company. Larger companies, though, have internal recruiters who manage the process for pretty much every opening, whether the candidate is internal or external.

I applied for a new role in my company last year and dealt extensively with an internal recruiter. I am in the final stages for a new role at a new company, and the process is being managed by one of their internal recruiters. He scheduled interviews and provides me updates - if/when the time comes that I am offered the job, I expect he will be the one to give me the offer.

Last edited by LizfromtheBronx; 03-24-2017 at 08:11 AM.. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2017, 06:22 PM
 
144 posts, read 129,946 times
Reputation: 84
Thanks for the feedback. I met and interviewed with the recruiter today, so now I know what the situation is.

You all were correct that this is nothing out of the ordinary. For this internal promotion, the company conducting the interviews would normally speak with every applicant, which became a significant burden. The process would drag on and some of the better candidates were getting lost in the numbers. With that in mind, the company changed things. The committee who makes the decision started working with the recruiter to drastically trim down the field. Instead of 40 or more candidates getting an interview, the recruiter would speak with a pre-selected "Top 15," and then submit her Top 10 to go on to the committee round.

Being on the right side of this cutdown, I feel this is beneficial. Investing more time in the top candidates instead of every single person who applies is the smart play, even though there will be plenty of hurt feelings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top