Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In Japanese, calling Chinese man 'China-jin" is offensive too, and the correct form is Chuugoku-jin. The former derived from some European language, and the latter derived from Chinese.
In Jamaica they use it a lot. I don't see how it's offensive, I would use it happily as long as the person is actual Chinese and not Korean or Vietnamese etc.
My guess is that back in the days of the Asian Exclusionary Laws in the US, "Chinaman" was used as a pejorative. The others you list have no such stigma. These days, as your question illustrates, few people know there was such a thing as Asian Exclusionary Laws, and have no image in particular attached to the word "Chinaman". The world has moved on, as the world does tend to do, so it's no longer an issue except with the oldest generations.
My guess is that back in the days of the Asian Exclusionary Laws in the US, "Chinaman" was used as a pejorative. The others you list have no such stigma. These days, as your question illustrates, few people know there was such a thing as Asian Exclusionary Laws, and have no image in particular attached to the word "Chinaman". The world has moved on, as the world does tend to do, so it's no longer an issue except with the oldest generations.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.