Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Mexico City seems so interesting to visit, but I think its name holds it back. People see "Mexico" in the title and automatically assume it's some crappy desert town in Northern Mexico. Maybe they should call it Tenochtitlan again
I always dislike city names that use the name of the country.
I don't know if that's true or not but MX City is way underrated. So much going on down there and just the sheer size of it is pathetic why there isn't more tourists visiting. Any random small beach town in Mexico gets more attention than arguably the biggest city on this hemisphere.
Yes, it is hugely underrated. Unfortunately many people have an old idea of what the city is like. Lots of art, culture, great food. I really like the book stores, outdoor markets and cafes there.
Mexico City seems so interesting to visit, but I think its name holds it back. People see "Mexico" in the title and automatically assume it's some crappy desert town in Northern Mexico. Maybe they should call it Tenochtitlan again
I think that is a great idea to change the name back to Tenochtitlan, a way more interesting and meaningful name. Maybe it's good that it isn't a super popular destination, keeps the annoying people away. Let them go to their resorts. Lol
I think that is a great idea to change the name back to Tenochtitlan, a way more interesting and meaningful name. Maybe it's good that it isn't a super popular destination, keeps the annoying people away. Let them go to their resorts. Lol
In this I have to agree with you an Warsawa. Back in the 80's and 90's the whole country image was affected by Mexico City and now the roles have been reverted.
I wonder what would be easier; to name rename the city or the country. If is the city, we can all agree Tenochtitlam can fill the void, but how about the country; Nueva España perhaps?
And much more than that, for a country that began requiring visa from its largest latin american market only for a cow United States had someday, and even accepting USA's visa to enter in its own country without the mexican visa...
1. Tacos, Speedy gonzales, indigenous people going to the US in hordes, pancho villa is not a proper 21st century image
2. Mexico city's name doesn't favor it.... Mexico city = Mexico to most people.... It's sad a modern 21st century megalopolis gets ignored because of its name. Sadly cancun is more recognized!
In this I have to agree with you an Warsawa. Back in the 80's and 90's the whole country image was affected by Mexico City and now the roles have been reverted.
I wonder what would be easier; to name rename the city or the country. If is the city, we can all agree Tenochtitlam can fill the void, but how about the country; Nueva España perhaps?
I think the country name is fine tbh, just the city that needs the name change
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
