Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-26-2014, 09:26 AM
 
Location: Murrieta, CA
1,336 posts, read 1,827,063 times
Reputation: 2419

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tijlover View Post
^Someone hasn't been introduced to the omnipresent, anti-development NIMBY's along the California coastline!
Quote:
Originally Posted by saffordpastor View Post
NIMBY's love solar, wind, and all sorts of other alternative energies....as long as they don't impede their view of the mountains, desert, surf etc.

Put them where folks are powerless and poor, and have no resources like the liberal aristocracy to fight them.

All of what you said is true. The good news is that the Desal plants are small. Click on the Carlsbad link and you will see it is no bigger than a small office building. It is not like the oil wells off the Santa Barbara coast. Or the big nuclear plants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2014, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Murrieta, CA
1,336 posts, read 1,827,063 times
Reputation: 2419
Default Photo

Here is a photo of the plant:

Carlsbad Desalination Project | Desalination Plant
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2014, 10:51 AM
 
Location: 77450
473 posts, read 671,737 times
Reputation: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by happyinca View Post
Hmmm I don't think that is likely. California will develop their own local supply from the Pacific ocean. Then Southern California won't need as much water from the Colorado River. That will free up more water for Arizona. I work in water, read all the articles daily and there are no plans to build a pipeline from Los Angeles to Southern Nevada.

The Desalination Plant in Carlsbad will only supply 7% of the water to San Diego County. The plants won't produce enough to supply California. There won't be enough left over to ship water to Arizona or Nevada. Not to mention the cost to build those pipelines so that idea is not feasible.

Reducing California's dependence on the Colorado River is a win/win for Arizona though.
My point is pumping ocean water to Nevada to form salt lakes there. The evaporation of the lakes will bring more rain to Nevada and Arizona. The lakes themselves will increase the land value of Nevada. Building a 500 mile pipeline costs less than a highway of the same length, and solar or wind can be used to pump the water.

Just some wild thoughts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2014, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Murrieta, CA
1,336 posts, read 1,827,063 times
Reputation: 2419
Quote:
Originally Posted by fengxg View Post
My point is pumping ocean water to Nevada to form salt lakes there. The evaporation of the lakes will bring more rain to Nevada and Arizona. The lakes themselves will increase the land value of Nevada. Building a 500 mile pipeline costs less than a highway of the same length, and solar or wind can be used to pump the water.

Just some wild thoughts.
I think you are 100 years ahead of everyone else! When there are 300 Desal plants in California, and more water than California needs, then they can build those pipelines and pump the water to Arizona.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2014, 08:05 PM
 
Location: Tucson/Nogales
23,270 posts, read 29,128,134 times
Reputation: 32670
Let's not forget that Baja California also gets a portion of the Colorado River water as well, and lessening their dependence on the river water would help as well. And they could build a desal plant 40 miles south of Yuma on the Gulf of California. But, they're not going to spend the money to build one, the Big 3 would have to do that!

Long ago, Harry Chandler, of Los Angeles, had a huge 800,000 acre spread west of Yuma, and he was instrumental in delaying the construction of the Hoover Dam. When the negotiations for allotments took place, he made sure there'd be an allotment for his acreage in Baja.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2014, 09:40 PM
 
1,699 posts, read 2,439,321 times
Reputation: 3463
Quote:
Originally Posted by fengxg View Post
My point is pumping ocean water to Nevada to form salt lakes there. The evaporation of the lakes will bring more rain to Nevada and Arizona. The lakes themselves will increase the land value of Nevada. Building a 500 mile pipeline costs less than a highway of the same length, and solar or wind can be used to pump the water.

Just some wild thoughts.
There are a few lakes out there, and it is not exactly pooring rain. But that is something I have no knowledge about...
What if the water transforms in rain clouds and the wind takes it to Indiana????? Os worse, Florida, where it rains more than enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2014, 10:04 PM
 
Location: Murrieta, CA
1,336 posts, read 1,827,063 times
Reputation: 2419
Quote:
Originally Posted by tijlover View Post
Let's not forget that Baja California also gets a portion of the Colorado River water as well, and lessening their dependence on the river water would help as well. And they could build a desal plant 40 miles south of Yuma on the Gulf of California. But, they're not going to spend the money to build one, the Big 3 would have to do that!

Long ago, Harry Chandler, of Los Angeles, had a huge 800,000 acre spread west of Yuma, and he was instrumental in delaying the construction of the Hoover Dam. When the negotiations for allotments took place, he made sure there'd be an allotment for his acreage in Baja.
A Desal plant is being built in Baja. Otay Water District (South San Diego) is involved and will purchase some of the water. I don't have a lot of info on it but here is a link:

The Star-News | Star news Chula vista|star news national city|National City local news|national city local business|national city sports
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2014, 10:32 PM
 
Location: Tucson/Nogales
23,270 posts, read 29,128,134 times
Reputation: 32670
Exciting, encouraging news Happyinca, thanks for that upload! Nice thing about situating it in Rosarito Beach is you don't have a bunch of screaming/arguing NIMBY's to delay its construction for years, perhaps a decade! This will lessen Baja's dependence on Colorado River water as well, but you'll still have that water-sucking Baja agricultural district west of Yuma, AZ to contend with.

And, let's hope this adds more much-needed greenery to the Tijuana/Rosarito Beach areas as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2014, 05:17 AM
 
Location: 77450
473 posts, read 671,737 times
Reputation: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by corydon View Post
There are a few lakes out there, and it is not exactly pooring rain. But that is something I have no knowledge about...
What if the water transforms in rain clouds and the wind takes it to Indiana????? Os worse, Florida, where it rains more than enough.
The effects of large lakes causing precipitation is called lake effect. The lake has to be of decent size to have lake effect. The only lake on Colorado Plateau that has lake effect is the Great Salt Lake. The precipitation of Salt Lake City is much more than area nearby. If we can make a lake in Lincoln County north of Las Vegas, it will make Nevada and Northern Arizona much wetter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2014, 11:06 PM
 
Location: Murrieta, CA
1,336 posts, read 1,827,063 times
Reputation: 2419
Quote:
Originally Posted by tijlover View Post
Exciting, encouraging news Happyinca, thanks for that upload! Nice thing about situating it in Rosarito Beach is you don't have a bunch of screaming/arguing NIMBY's to delay its construction for years, perhaps a decade! This will lessen Baja's dependence on Colorado River water as well, but you'll still have that water-sucking Baja agricultural district west of Yuma, AZ to contend with.

And, let's hope this adds more much-needed greenery to the Tijuana/Rosarito Beach areas as well.
You are welcome. I spoke with someone today involved with the project. I think they are about two years away from coming on-line. Yes it will lessen their need for Colorado River water which indeed is a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top