Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-05-2023, 08:15 AM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,195 posts, read 107,823,938 times
Reputation: 116097

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike from back east View Post
Today, Governor Hobbs declined to renew one of four leases that the Saudi firm, Fondomonte, uses to lease land at $25/acre -- which includes free water -- enough water for a city of 50,000 people. The other three leases will not be renewed when they expire in March 2024. Finally some common sense.
Arizona has been having problems also with REIT's locking up water supplies in exurb-type locations, and sinking deeper wells than nearby newly-developed communities for their own developments featuring golf courses, so that the people who bought new homes in a nearby development found a few months after moving in, that their water fixtures sputter and run dry. They were stuck with a new 30-year mortgage in homes that had become unlivable.

This situation was covered in detail in a New Yorker article years ago,and there was a rash of updates on the general issue of suburban developments' water supplies in the magazine last year. I wonder if the State has taken any steps to address this. AZ needs to have laws on the books protecting its water before much of it ends up in the hands of the highest bidder. All SW-ern states need to take steps to guard against this.

I read there's now a law on the books requiring developers to have a 100-year water supply before they'll be given building permits. I don't see that that would solve the problem. It might boil down to a no-growth policy in AZ. Groundwater can't be pumped forever. It is at best a temporary solution.

Last edited by Ruth4Truth; 10-05-2023 at 08:29 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top