Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Asia
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-11-2023, 02:12 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,309 posts, read 39,725,430 times
Reputation: 21386

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by maomao View Post
hehe, i have to admit that i purposely baited for a reply with that number.

having worked in census and studied statistic, I can tell you that such a percentage is insignificant. It's actually way more accurate to call the population static rather than declined.

and yes, you can always make statistics fit your narrative. it definitely moves the needle on per capita GDP when you have that massive of a population. those so called "china experts" should study statistics first before getting into geopolitics.

I guess you can make numbers fit any narrative, but the more of a stretch it is, the less believable and contradictory your narrative is. I think in truth, the population decline probably did hit faster than had been projected in the last couple of decades. That's understandable given how rapid change was and how stochastic things are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-12-2023, 06:37 PM
 
Location: Taipei
8,882 posts, read 8,498,938 times
Reputation: 7438
Population decline hit China literally at the same time as it hit Korea and Taiwan, aka a good 30 years too early for a developing country whose GDP per capita is smaller than 20% of that of the US, but of course a particular group of people on a specific kind of paycheck have to go extreme lengths to spin it as something positive, lol.

It’d be admirable effort if it wasn’t so sad and pathetic.

Last edited by Greysholic; 02-12-2023 at 07:50 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2023, 07:00 PM
 
5,527 posts, read 3,284,766 times
Reputation: 7764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greysholic View Post
The difference is these countries are developed countries. China is a developing country.
It's true China will get old before it gets rich.

However countries like Greece are on the verge of exiting developed country status at the same time as and partly due to a declining population. It's even worse in eastern Europe, which was neither developed nor developing. (I prefer the old term "second world".) Nevermind countries like Thailand which have the same birth rate as China and are less developed.

Every country on earth will eventually have to contend with this problem. The countries that got rich before they got old are few in number, probably fewer than thirty, and that includes a lot of small European countries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2023, 07:54 PM
 
Location: Taipei
8,882 posts, read 8,498,938 times
Reputation: 7438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avondalist View Post
It's true China will get old before it gets rich.

However countries like Greece are on the verge of exiting developed country status at the same time as and partly due to a declining population. It's even worse in eastern Europe, which was neither developed nor developing. (I prefer the old term "second world".) Nevermind countries like Thailand which have the same birth rate as China and are less developed.

Every country on earth will eventually have to contend with this problem. The countries that got rich before they got old are few in number, probably fewer than thirty, and that includes a lot of small European countries.
Exactly, the examples of Greece, Eastern Europe and Thailand is why China will never be on America's level. It will be another Brazil/Russia, not America.

Now if they choose the path of Brazil at least everybody can still live in peace and could maintain a somewhat positive image (to those who don't know any better anyway), unfortunately China is more like Russia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2023, 09:19 PM
 
4,698 posts, read 4,093,054 times
Reputation: 2483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avondalist View Post
Nevermind countries like Thailand which have the same birth rate as China and are less developed.
This is not true.

Thailand is not less developed than China. As you can see below GDP per capita (PPP) is similar. And if you take into account that China might be inflating it's figures, then it could be Thailand that is more developed.

China: 21,291
Thailand: 21,114
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...PP)_per_capita

And the birth rate is not the same. Birth rate per 1000 people in China is 6.77, which is among the lowest in the world. Thailand is low and declining too, but it is around 9.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-64300190.amp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2023, 04:04 AM
 
Location: Taipei
8,882 posts, read 8,498,938 times
Reputation: 7438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camlon View Post
This is not true.

Thailand is not less developed than China. As you can see below GDP per capita (PPP) is similar. And if you take into account that China might be inflating it's figures, then it could be Thailand that is more developed.

China: 21,291
Thailand: 21,114
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...PP)_per_capita

And the birth rate is not the same. Birth rate per 1000 people in China is 6.77, which is among the lowest in the world. Thailand is low and declining too, but it is around 9.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-64300190.amp
Turkey’s PPP per capita is higher than Latvia and Slovakia. That’s all you need to know about how dumb the metric is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2023, 04:37 AM
 
4,698 posts, read 4,093,054 times
Reputation: 2483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greysholic View Post
Turkey’s PPP per capita is higher than Latvia and Slovakia. That’s all you need to know about how dumb the metric is.
Latvia and Slovakia isn't that rich, so I am not surprised that Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey have similar GDP per capita.

Since you love nominal. Can you conform that you think Russia grew in 2022 as its currency got stronger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2023, 04:46 AM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,041 posts, read 14,290,041 times
Reputation: 16825
Declining birthrates in socialist countries are offset by the higher birthrates in non-socialist countries.
{If a country has a "socialist insecurity" program, it's socialist.}
Ironically, back in the 15th - 19th centuries, Europe's surplus population was exported across the planet, forming colonies in Australia, Asia, Africa and the Americas.
Now, the surplus from those areas may be emigrating to Europe (and other "socialist paradises").
- - - -
In the coming decades, when India's population exceeds China, we may see a dramatic shift. But to what?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2023, 06:24 AM
 
Location: Taipei
8,882 posts, read 8,498,938 times
Reputation: 7438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camlon View Post
Latvia and Slovakia isn't that rich, so I am not surprised that Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey have similar GDP per capita.

Since you love nominal. Can you conform that you think Russia grew in 2022 as its currency got stronger.
Latvia and Slovakia aren't that rich, but Turkey is poor as ****.

Ruble has barely been traded after the sanctions so it's not really that relevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2023, 10:26 AM
pdw
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
2,721 posts, read 3,134,957 times
Reputation: 1868
Developed, democratic nations in the West who are open to immigrants will have their economies continue to grow for much longer as they attract investors and innovators leaving the countries with higher birth rates. I’m sure the CCP would love to “call home” the tens of millions of ethnic Chinese living overseas for “patriotic reasons” but except for those with a strong financial incentive to move to mainland China, there’s going to be almost no immigration and they will have to contend with a declining population. Much of the world may have to rethink concepts of multiculturalism unless they want the same thing to happen to them. I bet down the road, though, immigration won’t be the guarantee of population growth it once was since birth rates are falling in most of the world except for most of Africa and a few other countries if I remember right. Countries with the best technology sectors and the most automation will probably be the best equipped to deal with an aging population, as well as a large, well funded healthcare sector to support the elderly. China is not looking good in this regard
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Asia

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top