Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-06-2011, 10:19 AM
 
2,406 posts, read 3,359,137 times
Reputation: 907

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by toll_booth View Post
Let me get this straight: Some people are opposed to the referendum BECAUSE it dares to include funding for the Beltline? With voters like that, no wonder there's a real chance this referendum won't pass.
I think they are against it because there is little evidence that the Beltline does anything to address the city's transportation needs. It does do many positive things to spur development downtown and redevelop the interior of the city, but it really isn't going to help the region's transportation network. 30 years down the road it might be an integral part of the cities transportation grid (largely due ot the infill the Beltline stimulates), but do you really think it will help much in the first few years? I think that is the problem people have with the Beltline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-06-2011, 10:54 AM
 
32,038 posts, read 36,926,328 times
Reputation: 13332
Although I'm a huge fan of the Beltline I'd almost rather see it go its own way if it's going to be a show-stopper for the TIA.

The Beltline was planned and funding was supposed to be sufficient before the idea of a TIA came along. Hopefully sufficient funding can be raised via the TAD and through other sources to at least get the NE quadrant developed with transit. That's only 4.5 miles.

If it's successful, then it should spur further interest and allow the city to go back to the well with funding requests. Of course the Beltline has never been purely a transportation project. It's parks and trails components have always been big selling points.

And think about this. If this were being built in Alpharetta or Perimeter, would City of Atlanta residents be as eager about seeing that they get TIA money?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2011, 11:05 AM
JPD
 
12,138 posts, read 18,340,008 times
Reputation: 8005
Quote:
Originally Posted by toll_booth View Post
Let me get this straight: Some people are opposed to the referendum BECAUSE it dares to include funding for the Beltline? With voters like that, no wonder there's a real chance this referendum won't pass.
A real chance? Let's not kid ourselves. There 's NO WAY this thing will come anywhere close to passing.

I say that as a pretty strong supporter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2011, 11:24 AM
 
Location: Home of the Braves
1,164 posts, read 1,269,233 times
Reputation: 1154
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtcorndog View Post
I think they are against it because there is little evidence that the Beltline does anything to address the city's transportation needs. It does do many positive things to spur development downtown and redevelop the interior of the city, but it really isn't going to help the region's transportation network. 30 years down the road it might be an integral part of the cities transportation grid (largely due ot the infill the Beltline stimulates), but do you really think it will help much in the first few years? I think that is the problem people have with the Beltline.
I think this transit initiative should put forward both short- and long-term solutions. Short term, we need more and bigger roads. Long term, we need to develop the city inward to address transportation problems because it becomes progressively more difficult to efficiently connect sparsely populated sprawl.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2011, 11:29 AM
 
Location: ATL
4,688 posts, read 8,041,151 times
Reputation: 1804
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPD View Post
A real chance? Let's not kid ourselves. There 's NO WAY this thing will come anywhere close to passing.

I say that as a pretty strong supporter.
It will pass by large numbers as long as the city of atl, dekalb,Cobb, gwinnett comes out and vote. Anybody that thinks otherwise need to use common sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2011, 12:13 PM
JPD
 
12,138 posts, read 18,340,008 times
Reputation: 8005
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonygeorgia View Post
It will pass by large numbers as long as the city of atl, dekalb,Cobb, gwinnett comes out and vote. Anybody that thinks otherwise need to use common sense.
Do you like cash bets?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2011, 12:28 PM
 
Location: ATL
4,688 posts, read 8,041,151 times
Reputation: 1804
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPD View Post
Do you like cash bets?
$106.43

deal?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2011, 12:31 PM
JPD
 
12,138 posts, read 18,340,008 times
Reputation: 8005
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonygeorgia View Post
$106.43

deal?
Looking forward to collecting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2011, 02:41 PM
 
906 posts, read 1,749,972 times
Reputation: 469
The penny tax proponents also need to explain that, just like in each suburban county, they have to fund projects in Atlanta that will get voters here to the polls. That doesn't mean it has to be the Beltline, specifically, but that seems like a project that will assist city residents, tourists, and even some commuters from the suburbs into the city (for work or shopping or play). So to me that seems as "regional" as any particular road-widening project within each individual county.

As I've said elsewhere, I'm certainly not voting for a tax that's almost entirely going to be roads. There's already a funding mechanism in place for that (gas tax), and politicians in this state have already been too cowardly to raise the darn tax themselves rather than drag all of us through all of this bickering. Personally, if the Beltline and/or Cobb train lines leave the list, I'm back to being an undecided-leaning-towards-NO vote.

And I think other transit advocates (among the public, not just the politicians and civil engineers) need to push back against these people complaining about EVERY. SINGLE. RAIL. PROPOSAL. They shouldn't get to have everything their way (roads, roads, roads) just because they're the loudest voice in the room.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2011, 03:06 PM
 
37,928 posts, read 42,177,228 times
Reputation: 27357
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonygeorgia View Post
It will pass by large numbers as long as the city of atl, dekalb,Cobb, gwinnett comes out and vote.
During the primaries when we have an incumbent Democratic president? FAT CHANCE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top