Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-04-2015, 06:43 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
149 posts, read 182,279 times
Reputation: 203

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcredskins View Post
Why do people who don't live in Cobb care so much if they join Marta?


When you drive South on I-75 in the morning, is North Bound completely empty?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-04-2015, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,694,141 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcredskins View Post
It's not a conspiracy, it's a fact of life. Cities/countries want to add rich areas that pay in more in tax revenue than they use. Atlanta would have loved to have gotten their hands on North Fulton cities. That's why they incorporated themselves. It blocked future attempts to be absorbed into the city.
All I hear are complaints and no suggestions on how to fix them. Clayton county has already shown that a county joining the MARTA system can, and I believe should, negotiate with MARTA as to how their taxes are spent. Any money collected from Cobb can be divided between funding Rail in the county, funding buses, and paying into the system as a whole.

It's not really fair to expect every cent of every dollar collected from Cobb to go right back into Cobb, since any improvements along the system would still give any Cobb citizen the benefit of those improvements. System-wide improvements / expansions help everyone who is part of the system, and I would say the same if those improvements were in Cobb, Gwinnet, Clayton, Fulton, or DeKalb.

This idea that it's your money and only yours to be spent only in your county defeats the whole purpose of joining a regional transit network.

That said, I do understand why you would want to insure your needs are met, that your level of access is brought up to at least meet the other counties. I would even argue that for a county like Cobb, they need better access simply due to their population.

It is therefore best if Cobb negotiated something along the lines of Clayton's 50/50 deal, but with percentages adjusted for Cobb's needs for connectivity. 75% for rail and 25% for buses SHOULD do it, though better analysis should be done.

I urge you to not just complain, but come up with ideas on how to fix it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 10:13 AM
 
Location: NW Atlanta
6,503 posts, read 6,121,383 times
Reputation: 4463
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourthwarden View Post

It is therefore best if Cobb negotiated something along the lines of Clayton's 50/50 deal, but with percentages adjusted for Cobb's needs for connectivity. 75% for rail and 25% for buses SHOULD do it, though better analysis should be done.
I would definitely have no problem with this, and even 25% would expand their buses far beyond CCT's existing system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,694,141 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gulch View Post
I would definitely have no problem with this, and even 25% would expand their buses far beyond CCT's existing system.
EXACTLY. No matter what, there would be an increase from what they're getting now, with the highly likely possibility of getting much more.

If Cobb is as much a cash source as people like to say (no doubt about it really), then they would have immense negotiating power when at the table with MARTA.

I can all but guarantee you Cobb won't get swindled, especially if they work with MARTA to get what Cobb wants out of the deal. The real hurdle is to get to the table at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 11:45 AM
 
32,026 posts, read 36,788,671 times
Reputation: 13311
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourthwarden View Post
All I hear are complaints and no suggestions on how to fix them. Clayton county has already shown that a county joining the MARTA system can, and I believe should, negotiate with MARTA as to how their taxes are spent. Any money collected from Cobb can be divided between funding Rail in the county, funding buses, and paying into the system as a whole.

It's not really fair to expect every cent of every dollar collected from Cobb to go right back into Cobb, since any improvements along the system would still give any Cobb citizen the benefit of those improvements. System-wide improvements / expansions help everyone who is part of the system, and I would say the same if those improvements were in Cobb, Gwinnet, Clayton, Fulton, or DeKalb.

This idea that it's your money and only yours to be spent only in your county defeats the whole purpose of joining a regional transit network.

That said, I do understand why you would want to insure your needs are met, that your level of access is brought up to at least meet the other counties. I would even argue that for a county like Cobb, they need better access simply due to their population.

It is therefore best if Cobb negotiated something along the lines of Clayton's 50/50 deal, but with percentages adjusted for Cobb's needs for connectivity. 75% for rail and 25% for buses SHOULD do it, though better analysis should be done.

I urge you to not just complain, but come up with ideas on how to fix it.
Good suggestions. Hopefully those old boys up in Cobb are reading this forum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
5,621 posts, read 5,935,590 times
Reputation: 4905
Yea I think Cobb and Gwinnett would have a lot of sway if they want to join. The 2nd largest county in the state and one of the largest (4th?) would be a huge grab for Marta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 01:04 PM
 
39 posts, read 33,744 times
Reputation: 27
Fact of the matter is that most of the stations and most of the riders won't be in Cobb, so again, unless Cobb can pay less in, it's not going to happen. Cobb joining Mary's isn't about what's good for ATL, it's about what's good for Cobb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 01:48 PM
 
39 posts, read 33,744 times
Reputation: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by st3mpy View Post


When you drive South on I-75 in the morning, is North Bound completely empty?
Relatively empty because most people live outside the city, and drive in for work and leave after work. I reverse commuted to Kennesaw everyday with no problems. If you take the Marta, then the highway traffic situation on't affect you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 04:24 PM
 
559 posts, read 832,549 times
Reputation: 517
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjay57 View Post
Good suggestions. Hopefully those old boys up in Cobb are reading this forum.
You unknowingly hit the nail on the head, Arjay.

I'd guess I talk to more Cobb officials/politicians than most on this board. There is a big age-gap in the pro-transit vs hate-MARTA contentions. Under 50 is largely pro transit. Over 60 is vehemently anti-MARTA.

And make no mistake, the older Cobb folks aren't really anti-transit. They just HATE, and I mean HATE any mention of MARTA. "Decades of horrible management" gets thrown around often. "Publicly funded employment agency" ... "Haven't turned a profit in 40 years" .... etc.

And there is, of course, the "I won't use it, so I don't want to pay for it" group ... usually from again, the older, wealthy folks in East Cobb.

Another factor - Cobb residents over 62 pay no school taxes, which are roughly 80% of property taxes. Until the Braves announcement, the average age of Cobb residents was getting older every year. Since then, and w/ the construction of nearly 4,500 new apartment/condo units around Cumberland, that average is now starting to flatten or even go lower due to millennials.

You could take away the over-62 exemption, but that's politically nuclear. If you did, you'd have a more pro-transit crowd due to the mass exodus of senior protesters to Woodstock/Canton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2015, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,694,141 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcredskins View Post
Fact of the matter is that most of the stations and most of the riders won't be in Cobb, so again, unless Cobb can pay less in, it's not going to happen. Cobb joining Mary's isn't about what's good for ATL, it's about what's good for Cobb.
An who's decided that? Cobb would have leverage enough to work with MARTA to plan routes. That's not even taking into account that MARTA would want to put the lines where they would be used. Anything that MARTA built would have to go through rounds of studies, ensuring it met public need.

'Most of the stations and most of the riders won't be in Cobb' is an odd statement, considering I already offered a solution to that. If Cobb negotiated that a majority of its funding go to rail, then a direct part of that would be including how much service MARTA could afford to build inside Cobb.

There's no reason for Cobb to pay a lesser rate than any other county, considering that the amount of service they get will be directly proportional to what they pay.

Cobb joining MARTA isn't about what's good for ATL or Cobb, it's about what's good for the METRO. Cobb doesn't exist in a vacuum, nor does any other county / city. Plenty of people commute to work in the county. Plenty commute to work outside of it. Plenty travel between many parts of the METRO for entertainment, shopping, employment, schooling, so on and so on.

Improving mobility helps everyone, and yes that includes Cobb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top