Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-17-2017, 07:38 AM
 
Location: NW Atlanta
6,503 posts, read 6,118,746 times
Reputation: 4463

Advertisements

New interchanges, widening are concerns with 285/400 managed lanes - Reporter Newspapers

Quote:
Sandy Springs officials are offering formal input on plans to add “managed lanes” to I-285 and Ga. 400, including ideas for new interchanges with local streets and concerns about the ever-wider highways eating into neighborhoods and limiting mass transit alternatives.

“I like the idea of [recommending] minimally invasive solutions, and let the engineers figure it out,” said Mayor Rusty Paul at the May 16 City Council meeting, where officials discussed a preliminary recommendation letter they planned to finish within 48 hours.

The Georgia Department of Transportation is just beginning its massive reconstruction of the 285/400 interchange, which will continue into 2020. But it’s already in the early planning stages for another, follow-up project adding “managed lanes” to both highways within the next decade. “Managed” means the lanes have some kind of restricted access, usually by a toll. The managed lanes are proposed as entirely new, separate lanes, with early sketches showing them elevated on columns on 285 and as regular surface lanes on a widened 400.

GDOT is already seeking early input from cities along the highways, Assistant City Manager Bryant Poole said at the May 16 City Council meeting. GDOT and city staff are proposing potential new interchanges to study, and the city is pushing for right of way to be left for transit and multiuse trails. Sandy Springs officials want one interchange location off the table – at Sandy Springs Circle – while debating whether to include one near the North Springs MARTA Station, which could be locally controversial.

The timeframe is long, with the Ga. 400 lanes estimated to start construction in 2022 and the I-285 version in 2024. But early right of way acquisition could start as soon as this year, and Mayor Paul said “time is of the essence” on giving input and direction to GDOT.
Proposed layout along I-285:

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-17-2017, 07:50 AM
 
32,019 posts, read 36,773,537 times
Reputation: 13295
Good news! I hope they move up on this quickly.

The top end of 285 is arguably the ATL's Main Street and what happens there affects a huge part of the city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,857,747 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjay57 View Post
Good news! I hope they move up on this quickly.

The top end of 285 is arguably the ATL's Main Street and what happens there affects a huge part of the city.
Atlanta's main street is Peachtree, don't get a human scaled street and a car sewer confused.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 08:54 AM
 
5,633 posts, read 5,357,065 times
Reputation: 3855
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
Atlanta's main street is Peachtree, don't get a human scaled street and a car sewer confused.
Congrats on the buzzword to full-sentence ratio here! Impressive!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
5,242 posts, read 6,236,790 times
Reputation: 2783
Oh my, that is hideous. That looks like the thoughtless, highway first design that is so popular in Texas. Please no. The new I-75 N lanes are ugly enough, this is setting the bar even lower.

If there wasn't the upside of AVs using Managed Lanes in the future, I would be 100% against them. It's time to invest in actual alternatives, not exclusive lanes for people with more $$$ than others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 09:23 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,857,747 times
Reputation: 5703
How many billions of dollars will this cost? With the funding for this project, we could build a rail line across the Top-End instead and create a REAL alternative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 09:47 AM
 
454 posts, read 821,131 times
Reputation: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
How many billions of dollars will this cost? With the funding for this project, we could build a rail line across the Top-End instead and create a REAL alternative.
Yep total waste of money that will just encourage even more congestion and ten years from now they will want more money to upgrade again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 10:16 AM
 
Location: Odessa, FL
2,218 posts, read 4,370,665 times
Reputation: 2942
Quote:
Mayor Paul agreed and noted the conceptual designs have no room for MARTA’s proposed Red Line train or bus rapid transit extension along the corridor. The PATH400 multiuse trail is intended to eventually extend there as well.
Stupid! Extend the Red Line first, then they can start thinking about adding lanes.

When I lived in Johns Creek and worked downtown, if the Red Line had come all the way up to Mansell I would likely have taken it every day. Driving all the way to Doraville or Chamblee then getting on MARTA saved zero time and actually made my commute longer, which meant that I eventually abandoned the idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 10:32 AM
 
2,289 posts, read 2,945,073 times
Reputation: 2286
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
How many billions of dollars will this cost? With the funding for this project, we could build a rail line across the Top-End instead and create a REAL alternative.
According to a quick internet search I285 handles 2 million people a day while all of marta handles 500k. How many of that 2 million people would use your proposed rail line? 20k? 100k?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 11:26 AM
 
5,633 posts, read 5,357,065 times
Reputation: 3855
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
How many billions of dollars will this cost? With the funding for this project, we could build a rail line across the Top-End instead and create a REAL alternative.
Agreed. (I know that probably shocks you) This idea looks terrible.

Extend the red line up through Roswell to Alpharetta. And go much further than just a top-end arc. How about a big northside loop that covers Perimeter, Sandy Springs, Cumberland, Vinings, West Village, Bolton, West Midtown, Arts Center, Emory, Northlake, and Doraville. And extend the Gold line up to at least Norcross. I know I would use the hell out of all that, even though if they started building it today, I'd be dead before it was finished.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top