Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-26-2010, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Austin
2,522 posts, read 6,038,319 times
Reputation: 707

Advertisements

Looked up the other 14 cities ahead of us in population, and they all have either light rail or rapid transit...Yep, we seem to worship stats and top ten lists here in Austin, so I hate to toss out another one...but, this one makes you think a bit, doesn't it?

One caveat..one of the cities is working on it now, for built out in 2012, San Antonio...thats what sparked conversation about the Austin-SA train on here, by the way..

http://www.viainfo.net/BusService/BRT.aspx


All the other 13 cities have fully functioning systems..Austin has nothing..

Last edited by inthecut; 09-26-2010 at 03:51 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2010, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
We grew very fast in the past few years.
Urban sprawl and mass transit aren't good bedfellows unless you are talking about bus transit.
If you can't build over or under then it has to be planned in but it wasn't.
You barely had roads planned in with these developers over the past years.
I know the outlying cities had to do their own road expansions and building schools nevermind even consider mass transit.

You can't just plop a few 500 home subdivisions on a 2 lane country road and expect there NOT to be road problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2010, 03:55 PM
 
Location: Corvallis, Oregon
653 posts, read 1,795,124 times
Reputation: 276
They tried, but didn't do a good job.
Now they find it important to try to show that the mass transit train they did spend so much on, was not a bad idea.
Gaining ridership for the train may now be the most important goal of the transit system.
If in the process, many people (who need service) lose it, that does not matter.

If they think that one group is more likely to ride, if their bus service to the Rail stop is more frequent, then cutting service completely to others, so as to increase the frequency of service to that group, is something they will do.

The stops (at least one I know of) is so poorly placed, that it takes the one bus that serves it over 10 minutes to pull in and out, during peak traffic (I didn't time it exactly, but I am pretty sure it was in excess of 10 minutes).
So the solution, cut out half the route area that bus serves, to make up the time.

What is needed is better planning.

Increasing train ridership should not be more important than serving the transit needs of the most citizens it is reasonable to serve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2010, 04:28 PM
 
634 posts, read 1,448,738 times
Reputation: 725
Austinites voted down true light rail around 10 years ago. Such foresight for such a "progressive" enclave.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2010, 04:32 PM
 
7,742 posts, read 15,134,243 times
Reputation: 4295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomadic9460678748 View Post
Austinites voted down true light rail around 10 years ago. Such foresight for such a "progressive" enclave.
You can go to the portland city data forum and read about their light rail there. Just because they have it doesnt mean that it is working well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2010, 07:30 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Not all cities are destined to have light rail. A good bus/taxi system in the city (Austin) would service it's purpose well. Build some mass parking garages at the edges and utilize the bus system.
I'm familiar with the northern end..so I would make The Domain a major hub since there's still land to build on..make a massive park and ride lot and have a good, reliable bus system that brings you downtown.

I hate going downtown due to the traffic and parking. But, if there was a good bus system, I would park at The Domain and take the bus downtown to do my business.

I think the problem is that Austin wants to service not only themselves but the outlying suburbs and towns as well. This will just be cost prohibitive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2010, 07:37 PM
 
Location: NW Austin
1,133 posts, read 4,187,850 times
Reputation: 174
Car pooling lanes might help too...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2010, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Holly Neighborhood, Austin, Texas
3,981 posts, read 6,739,779 times
Reputation: 2882
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomadic9460678748 View Post
Austinites voted down true light rail around 10 years ago. Such foresight for such a "progressive" enclave.
I was just looking at the map for this. Looks like it used many of the same existing ROWs as before but didn't have that Highland Mall/MLK eastward bend. Cost was over $1B so it is almost 10 times as costly as what was finally delivered.

Federal Transit Administration - Austin, Texas/Light Rail Corridors
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2010, 08:49 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by atlanta hope View Post
Car pooling lanes might help too...
They tried that in Florida when I lived there. I-95 ran similar to I-35 with 3 lanes. From Ft Lauderdale to Miami they blocked off that far left lane and called it HOV during rush hour.

The market in blow up dolls soared
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2010, 08:51 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
I was on I-35 yesterday in south Austin. Making my way home I noticed all the 18 wheelers on I-35 and thought to myself..yup..that 130 tollroad that would free up the truck traffic is working like a charm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top