Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-05-2014, 02:51 PM
 
3,834 posts, read 5,759,538 times
Reputation: 2556

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by orngkat View Post
My issue with the tear-downs happening all around my neighborhood is that a modestly sized home is replaced with one of 3500-4000 sf. Building single family homes of that size in the central core does not promote density so for a city who shouts that agenda, it does not make any sense. It sets the stage for every new listing of a previously modest house to be torn down rather than to consider other options.
1. It's virtually impossible to build 4,000 SF homes in central Austin right now on most lots - see, McMansion.
2. Not building these homes DOES prevent added density. It isn't a DINK couple looking for a 3500 SF home, it's a family of 5. Andy many of them end up moving to where these homes can be built quite readily selling their bungalows to childless couples.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-05-2014, 03:00 PM
 
2,602 posts, read 2,979,381 times
Reputation: 997
Quote:
Originally Posted by petro View Post
What neighborhood are you referring to exactly? Because with current permit restrictions, you could never build a 3500-4000 SF house on a typical single-family lot in central Austin.
Sure you can. _If_ you do a complete teardown.


McMansion allows 45% of lot area, so on a 8700 sq-ft lot (a fifth of an acre), you can get 3900. PLUS whatever area you can squeeze in that's exempt from McMansion (covered porches, dormers, finished attic space, garage, etc.).



You'll have to do 2/3 stories though. And good luck trying to fit it into an existing floorplan (hence the demo required).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2014, 04:14 PM
 
Location: Central East Austin
615 posts, read 780,720 times
Reputation: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Komeht View Post
1. It's virtually impossible to build 4,000 SF homes in central Austin right now on most lots - see, McMansion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
Sure you can [build a 3500-4000 SF house on a typical single-family lot ]. _If_ you do a complete teardown.
I hope you can see the how your two consecutive posts contradict each other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2014, 04:18 PM
 
1,558 posts, read 2,398,086 times
Reputation: 2601
The demos and rebuilds we are seeing in Allandale are at the minimum 3400 sf and two-story so they are definitely do-able. I guess it works because these are big lots.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 11:03 PM
 
319 posts, read 610,082 times
Reputation: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by orngkat View Post
The demos and rebuilds we are seeing in Allandale are at the minimum 3400 sf and two-story
What on Earth are you talking about? I've seen ONE home that meets this criteria on MLS in the last two years. There's one more being built there now that's 3300sf (and a million dollars). Are these not hitting MLS? I've only seen one (listed on 2014 AIA home tour, at 3500sf). The most common size I see is 2600sf - 2800sf, though lately that seems to be dropping to 1700sf - 2300sf. Thank you housing bubble 2.0, we really appreciate it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2014, 08:10 AM
 
1,558 posts, read 2,398,086 times
Reputation: 2601
Quote:
What on Earth are you talking about?
Maybe they're not on MLS? It is easy enough to look up permits and attached specs, I know of 2 going up right now:

1- Total Building Coverage on lot Sq. Ft. 3703
2- Total New/Addition Bldg Square Footage 3415

I don't know if that includes porches. Both appear to be fairly traditional in style.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2014, 08:23 AM
 
319 posts, read 610,082 times
Reputation: 130
Yes big and traditional seem to go together for some reason
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2014, 08:51 AM
 
1,549 posts, read 1,954,849 times
Reputation: 1668
Quote:
Originally Posted by balor123 View Post
What on Earth are you talking about? I've seen ONE home that meets this criteria on MLS in the last two years. There's one more being built there now that's 3300sf (and a million dollars). Are these not hitting MLS? I've only seen one (listed on 2014 AIA home tour, at 3500sf). The most common size I see is 2600sf - 2800sf, though lately that seems to be dropping to 1700sf - 2300sf. Thank you housing bubble 2.0, we really appreciate it.
You're only accounting for homes bought to be demoed and re-sold, not the ones that are bought for their lots to be built for those who intend to live there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top