Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Australia and New Zealand
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2014, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
9,556 posts, read 20,795,965 times
Reputation: 2833

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel,J View Post
Ah but is it, if one speaks English *properly* isn't perfect English also accentless English?

What accents does your dad have then?
Who decides what is proper English? I'm talking about pronunciation/enunciation.etc. RP was basically what the elite in the public schools, university and high society - including royalty - deemed 'correct' and is of course just another variant of English. Everything is spoken with an accent, just as every person has a distinct form. My dad has a sort of British-inflected Malaysian accent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2014, 02:50 PM
 
Location: NSW
3,801 posts, read 2,995,893 times
Reputation: 1375
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Postman View Post
It's the best word I could use, Australians of British - English, Scottish, Welsh, and Irish ancestry. Those of German and other northern European ancestry would count. Anyway, I'm sure what all of you mean.
I wonder how many white Australians would actually have been bothered doing an ancestry tree etc, especially if they have been here 4 generations or more - and they would be well and truly hybridized by then anyway with mixtures?
But white Anglo or Anglosaxon Australian is rarely used in personal descriptions by most white Aussies.
Unless they have a "splash" of something else, in a pre-description, it is not usually noteworthy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 03:00 PM
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
9,556 posts, read 20,795,965 times
Reputation: 2833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek41 View Post
I wonder how many white Australians would actually have been bothered doing an ancestry tree etc, especially if they have been here 4 generations or more - and they would be well and truly hybridized by then anyway with mixtures?
But white Anglo or Anglosaxon Australian is rarely used in personal descriptions by most white Aussies.
Unless they have a "splash" of something else, in a pre-description, it is not usually noteworthy.
Exactly. Why aren't they referred to as English or British Australians, unlike Italian Australians?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 03:05 PM
 
Location: NSW
3,801 posts, read 2,995,893 times
Reputation: 1375
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildColonialGirl View Post
As am I (anglo, not English) and I've never once been asked that in Australia, even in different states with a different accent.
Never really noticed regional accents in Oz, apart from perhaps SA.
There only seems to be accents associated with socioeconomic class and city vs rural or country areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 04:32 PM
 
1,051 posts, read 1,741,368 times
Reputation: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Postman View Post
Exactly. Why aren't they referred to as English or British Australians, unlike Italian Australians?
I doubt any Australian who's a descendent of Italian immigrants who arrived in the late 1800s or even early to mid 1900s would consider themselves "Italian", and that Italian background is likely to be only one strand of their ethnic makeup.

It's actually very common for early settlers from England or Scotland etc to be referred to as such. Similarly a recent arrival from those countries will also almost invariably be considered "English " or "Scottish" etc. Similarly the terms "Anglo Australian" or even "Anglo-Celtic" Australian.

You seem to be obsessed by people with Italian or other backgrounds.

Last edited by Richard1098; 06-19-2014 at 05:08 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 05:51 PM
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
9,556 posts, read 20,795,965 times
Reputation: 2833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard1098 View Post
I doubt any Australian who's a descendent of Italian immigrants who arrived in the late 1800s or even early to mid 1900s would consider themselves "Italian", and that Italian background is likely to be only one strand of their ethnic makeup.

It's actually very common for early settlers from England or Scotland etc to be referred to as such. Similarly a recent arrival from those countries will also almost invariably be considered "English " or "Scottish" etc. Similarly the terms "Anglo Australian" or even "Anglo-Celtic" Australian.

You seem to be obsessed by people with Italian or other backgrounds.
The majority of Italians arrived post-war and many still refer to themselves as Italian. In 2006 many even supported Italy over Australia. Maybe you're unaware, but they do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 06:09 PM
 
1,051 posts, read 1,741,368 times
Reputation: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Postman View Post
The majority of Italians arrived post-war and many still refer to themselves as Italian. In 2006 many even supported Italy over Australia. Maybe you're unaware, but they do.
I suspect the vast majority of people who have migrated here always retain at least sentimental attachments to their country of birth regardless of which country that is.

A game of soccer? That's a significant issue???

If you did the math I think you'd be surprised how varied the background of a lot of Aussies is. Even as early as the 1850s one in four immigrants were from countries outside the UK and Ireland. Their descendants are very much today's mainstream Australians.

Last edited by Richard1098; 06-19-2014 at 06:34 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 06:17 PM
 
14,767 posts, read 17,111,231 times
Reputation: 20658
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Postman View Post
The majority of Italians arrived post-war and many still refer to themselves as Italian. In 2006 many even supported Italy over Australia. Maybe you're unaware, but they do.
That's really strange. The people I watched that game with, were all going for Australia.

It was quite amusing to be actually asked who I was supporting in that game. As if the answer was already known in their own minds. When I answered, well I am Australian.... so Australia, THEY were the ones that were surprised.. "oooh, really".


As to your general question why some people decide to acknowledge their heritage, it could be because they're often asked "where they're from". Years of this can create in ones mind that indeed they are different from "Anglo" Australians.

However, yeah, this is a tired and had conversation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 06:33 PM
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
9,556 posts, read 20,795,965 times
Reputation: 2833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard1098 View Post
I suspect the vast majority of people who have migrated here always retain at least sentimental attachments to their country of birth regardless of which country that is.

A game of soccer? That's a significant issue???

If you did the math I think you'd be surprised how varied the backgrounds of a lot of Aussies is. Even as early as the 1850s one in four immigrants were from countries outside the UK and Ireland. Their descendants are very much today's mainstream Australians.
I'm not denying they are, but I'm just disputing your claim that they don't also identify as Italians or whatever group they are or have given up that identity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2014, 06:35 PM
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
9,556 posts, read 20,795,965 times
Reputation: 2833
Quote:
Originally Posted by artemis agrotera View Post
That's really strange. The people I watched that game with, were all going for Australia.

It was quite amusing to be actually asked who I was supporting in that game. As if the answer was already known in their own minds. When I answered, well I am Australian.... so Australia, THEY were the ones that were surprised.. "oooh, really".


As to your general question why some people decide to acknowledge their heritage, it could be because they're often asked "where they're from". Years of this can create in ones mind that indeed they are different from "Anglo" Australians.

However, yeah, this is a tired and had conversation.
It puzzled me too, but apparently that was the case. There was also disturbances when Croatia and Serbia played, or when Marcos Baghdadis the tennis player played at the Oz open. These were all Australians of those backgrounds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Australia and New Zealand

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top