Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-06-2010, 02:04 PM
NSX
 
877 posts, read 2,169,254 times
Reputation: 714

Advertisements

I think this is a great idea (working as a designer of vehicle safety systems). I see this as an effective idea with little downside.

About 300-400 people are killed every year (mostly small children) from backovers. The average car has around a 15 ft blind spot directly behind it (up to 30 ft+ for SUVs and pickup trucks). Without a backup camera, this area cannot be seen by just looking backwards. Today's Rear-view camera and pedestrian detection technology is not very expensive and very reliable. Most vehicles with these systems combine vision (cameras) and radar (object sensing) which provides the audible warning when you are getting too close to an object. The combination has been proven to be much better than either alone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2010, 06:05 PM
 
Location: Metro Washington DC
15,436 posts, read 25,829,503 times
Reputation: 10460
I must be wasting my time spending hours and hours teaching my teen how to back up safely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 06:24 PM
NSX
 
877 posts, read 2,169,254 times
Reputation: 714
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkf747 View Post
I must be wasting my time spending hours and hours teaching my teen how to back up safely.
Is it good to know how to backup safely? Of course, but it's not sufficient.

Every passenger vehicle has a blind-spot directly in back of the vehicle, even subcompacts have around a 15' blindspot, with SUVs more than 30'. You will not be able to see an object that is within this zone, no matter how careful you are. This is where the camera/radar systems come in. Even if your teen is doing everything right, it could be the other person, an animal, a toddler who is not paying attention and is in this zone cannot be seen in the rear-view mirror - but the system picks it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2010, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,451,194 times
Reputation: 5047
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkf747 View Post
I must be wasting my time spending hours and hours teaching my teen how to back up safely.
Any time spent mixing teens, driving, and safety is time well spent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2010, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Ohio
780 posts, read 2,926,974 times
Reputation: 638
Idiot-proof ideas create idiots.

Enough said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2010, 05:03 PM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,620,504 times
Reputation: 1275
completely idiotic. just more cost to add to the car.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2010, 05:39 PM
 
10,926 posts, read 22,008,266 times
Reputation: 10569
I've been backing up for 28 years and haven't hit anything yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2010, 09:37 PM
 
5,341 posts, read 6,526,325 times
Reputation: 6107
If People took responsibility for themselves as opposed to pointing
fingers for their mistakes this would not be an issue

How long does it take to walk to a vehicle or peek
around the back, sadly accidents will happen but to
make this mandatory is just encouraging more of the
same irresponsibility. What will someone say when they
back over someone in a vehicle equipped with a back
up camera

Vehicles today are more comfortable then some people's
living rooms and the attitude of many drivers is point and
steer if they are going forward or backwards it's no difference to them
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2010, 08:36 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,190,673 times
Reputation: 9270
Nice - yes. Mandatory - no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2010, 08:39 AM
 
10,926 posts, read 22,008,266 times
Reputation: 10569
All of this mandatory "safety" crap just dances around the actual problem, drivers not paying attention, giving unsafe drivers one more thing to ignore isn't going to accomplish anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top