Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If reliability is your first (and only) question - skip both of them. Judging by the fact you are getting a mid-2000's car with high mileage, sounds like the budget isnt too high, so your choices will be limited and most solid-as-a-rock used cars will have high resale to prove it, so your hands may be tied here.
Chrysler Crossfire would be more fun with its RWD layout (more fun) vs the FWD (torque steer) Eclipse. The Chrysler is also basically the first generation Mercedes SLK. Both interiors aren't very impressive, but I think the Crossfire has a better looking layout (both have lots of plastic bits). Horsepower wise you have about the same, I believe the Crossfire has 215 and the Eclipse has 210. But IMO I'd go with the Crossfire.
I know a guy that had a crossfire for a few years and a woman who still has hers. I also know a fair amount of bodies with actual ownership experience (past and present) on the Eclipse. From what they all say, and from what I know about their history with the cars, I'd have to give the nod to the Eclipse over the Crossfire - hands down. This in not only reliability but also in the cost of parts comparison, the all around performance and the all important "Total Blast to Drive" factor.
Of course both these cars being considered should be a stickshift, or your whole point of looking for a fun driving machine is mute.
If you're just looking for fun I'd go with the Crossfire.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.