Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffdano
ColdJensens - I think you expect too much. What would you suggest Mazda call their new super-high compression engine that uses direct injection, regular octane fuel, combined with lighter weight and efficient transmissions?
Hemi by the way is relatively meaningless today. It really doesn't offer a combustion advantage, and even more offensive, current "Hemi" engines don't have a truly hemispherical head. Chrysler's "Hemi" engines are no more special than comparable pushrod engines from GM. Chrysler brought back the name to distinguish their high performance V8s from everyone else's. If a hemi head was valuable, everyone would use it because it is not a patented feature.
|
An engine. It is not much different that anything else on the market. They might call it "Mazda's new high compression engine." . Besides, Skyactiv is not the name for hte engine, it is the name for a fictional "new technology" that applies to anything they come out with, including the engine.
I did not know they no longer made real Hemi engines. Found this:
The current-production "Hemi" V8, with its pinched chamber, does not have true hemispherical combustion chambers despite the name; rather, it bears a closer resemblance to the mid-1950s
polyspherical chamber, which Chrysler engineers developed as a lower-cost alternative head for their
V8 engines.
I guess calling it a "Pollie" just wasn't catchy.
That is as bad or worse than a made up lable that menas nothing, it is just misleading.