Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-11-2016, 01:32 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
8,555 posts, read 10,981,308 times
Reputation: 10808

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
It looks cool, but is still too "cute" to overcome the Miata-like chick car role.
I agree.

Bob.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-11-2016, 03:38 PM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,687,736 times
Reputation: 25236
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyAMG View Post
Still underpowered.
What happened to the rotary. The only one I ever owned was an old R1 with the R2 engine, but I had great fun blowing the doors off of muscle cars back in the '70s. I got rid of it after the second set of brakes, because it would go like a bandit but wouldn't stop so good. It was the only car I have ever owned that would get to 170 in less than a mile.

Did emission controls kill the rotary, or what?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Sugarmill Woods , FL
6,234 posts, read 8,443,944 times
Reputation: 13809
Big SHRUG!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 04:50 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX USA
5,251 posts, read 14,248,351 times
Reputation: 8231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
What happened to the rotary.

Poor gas mileage, oil consumption(by design), the engines also like to eat seals if you live in a colder climate.

Advantages and Disadvantages of a Rotary Engine - National Speed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,687,736 times
Reputation: 25236
For the person who thought I was talking about an RX, I owned an R1 compact sedan, and it was not the stock engine, which the seller told me came out of an R2, probably an RX-2. It even had headers, though I never opened them up. I suspect the noise would have shattered glass at 100 yards. I took it apart to see what it was like, and it was the simplest engine you can imagine. It was just a sandwich, with O-ring seals around all the bolts. Whoever had it apart before omitted a bunch of the o-rings, but it ran fine.

It was still quite a hot rod, and I clocked it at 128 mph in the quarter, still accelerating strongly. I have a lot of trouble imagining that a modern rotary could be called underpowered. The stock engine supposedly peaked at 7000 rpm, but the one I had ran fine to 9000. The guy may have done some balancing work on the rotors.

I bought it used in 1976. I think the body was a 1971. It had been built up for the racing circuit, but the owner ran into a divorce and had to give it up.

BTW, there have been 170 mph sedans on the road. I had an uncle that owned one in mid '60s. I think it was a Lincoln? I remember it was a big tuna boat sedan, with an even bigger motor. Going 170 mph on bias ply tires would have been a scary thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 09:35 PM
 
1,394 posts, read 1,403,751 times
Reputation: 2725
i think that is a beautiful little car. i had a miata several years ago and it was a fun, bullet proof little car. my only real issue was the size.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2016, 07:39 AM
 
Location: Austin
1,062 posts, read 981,191 times
Reputation: 1439
They should build a real coupe instead of screwing around with these hokey moveable hard tops
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2016, 09:12 AM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX USA
5,251 posts, read 14,248,351 times
Reputation: 8231
Quote:
Originally Posted by earthisle View Post
They should build a real coupe instead of screwing around with these hokey moveable hard tops
They sold an NB coupe, but it was in Japan only.



Mazda sold a Miata coupe - we just didn't know about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2016, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
16,548 posts, read 19,703,819 times
Reputation: 13331
I think Mazda has some very nice looking cars today. Finally??? SMH...

The best looking entry level CUV:



One of the better looking SUV's



I think this hatch is gorgeous!


Yea, I've been looking at Mazda's and test drove a CX-5 on Friday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2016, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Pikesville, MD
2,983 posts, read 3,092,208 times
Reputation: 4552
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyAMG View Post
Still underpowered.
Not really. It's about perfect for it's size and role. Way more powerful then the little British roadsters it is meant to emulate, like MGBs, TR6s and Austin Healeys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top