Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Don't love either one of them. I like the way the older ones look like the 2010 model. But then I still like the older Mustangs, hate the new ones. I'm actually considering getting a Veloster even though it was named one of the ugliest cars a few year ago. I think it's cool looking.
Whats up with the huge rims and very low profile tires on cars today? This car would look better with the wheels/tires they used to put on sports cars in the 60s and 70s
I prefer either a full retro treatment (Camaro/Challenger) or modern with just a hint of retro styling (most recent Impala & Charger). The first one is two much of a forced mixture, but the second wouldn't be bad with a little tweaking.
Whats up with the huge rims and very low profile tires on cars today?
Besides the look of sports cars, bigger diameter brakes needing bigger diameter wheels for clearance, and better suspensions allowing lower profile tires for superior handling (less sidewall flex) without sacrificing ride. Even basic sedans benefit from these changes.
The first one is a little too busy and it is hard to get a handle on the 2nd one. I still like the idea of these being produced. I am all for more fun choices.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.