Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-10-2008, 10:40 AM
 
Location: state of enlightenment
2,403 posts, read 5,240,453 times
Reputation: 2500

Advertisements

The writing has been on the wall for decades for US car makers because they build inefficient, mediocre non-competitive cars. Now they're in a death spiral. Inventory is piling up and will continue to pile up as the economy sinks. A bailout would only throw good money after bad and just delay the inevitable. The only way I see a bailout working is if the 3 companies consolidate into 1 and completely retool to produce electric and hybrid cars of the future. Nobody wants their current outdated dinosaurs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-10-2008, 10:46 AM
 
Location: the D
347 posts, read 1,357,579 times
Reputation: 171
I dont agree that the Big 3 make outdated dinosaurs.
Most people seem to compare experiences with old American cars that were unreliable (all cars were unreliable back then) with new Hondas/Toyotas of today.

Try a new GM/Ford/Chrysler and decide if they are outdated dinosaurs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2008, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Weehawken, NJ
2,179 posts, read 6,716,727 times
Reputation: 1167
Quote:
Originally Posted by DDevil View Post
I dont agree that the Big 3 make outdated dinosaurs.
Most people seem to compare experiences with old American cars that were unreliable (all cars were unreliable back then) with new Hondas/Toyotas of today.

Try a new GM/Ford/Chrysler and decide if they are outdated dinosaurs.
American cars have improved vastly, but this is karma for the U.S. automakers. Decades of crap, decades of mismanagement, decades of UAW bullying are now finally coming home to roost.

If they were smart, they would have bumped up the wick in the 80's and 90's. The US gov't will let Chrysler fail, but will bail out GM and Ford.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2008, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,547,540 times
Reputation: 18814
The big three concentrated on big money making suv's and trucks and now it had come to bite them in the ass. Why bailout gross missmanagement and stupidity?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2008, 11:44 AM
 
3,150 posts, read 8,716,443 times
Reputation: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by geos View Post
The writing has been on the wall for decades for US car makers because they build inefficient, mediocre non-competitive cars. Now they're in a death spiral. Inventory is piling up and will continue to pile up as the economy sinks. A bailout would only throw good money after bad and just delay the inevitable. The only way I see a bailout working is if the 3 companies consolidate into 1 and completely retool to produce electric and hybrid cars of the future. Nobody wants their current outdated dinosaurs.

Do you live under a rock? When was the last time you looked at ratings or the actual new cars themselves?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2008, 03:50 PM
 
465 posts, read 1,417,505 times
Reputation: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by DDevil View Post
I dont agree that the Big 3 make outdated dinosaurs.
Most people seem to compare experiences with old American cars that were unreliable (all cars were unreliable back then) with new Hondas/Toyotas of today.

Try a new GM/Ford/Chrysler and decide if they are outdated dinosaurs.
I thought American cars used to be good back in the day and then went downhill. Who is comparing new hondas/toyotas to old american cars? Old American cars probably were more reliable than there old Japanese counterparts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2008, 04:46 PM
 
Location: WA
5,641 posts, read 24,951,486 times
Reputation: 6574
The big three have improved their products but that will not save them.

They have a pension liability that is staggering... they have a relationship with labor that is poison... they have bad contracts with twice as many dealers as they need... they have many more plants than they need... they have bad contracts with suppliers... so they have a business model that will not work going forward regardless of product line-up.

On top of all that their competitors from Europe and Asia operate in countries with public health care and retirement so that each of their products is subsidized by taxpayers.

Loaning money to the US automakers is a very bad investment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2008, 05:10 PM
 
1,004 posts, read 2,703,931 times
Reputation: 669
The problem is, is that the U.S. automakers refuse to build a car with the same quality as Toyota or Honda. They truly care about building cars that break down, which have expensive repairs. I think this is where they realize their money is, its in repairs. The American people will no longer tolerate it.

My Honda Civic has 257K on it and nothing has ever gone wrong with it. How can I justify buying another brand of car?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2008, 05:53 PM
 
1,329 posts, read 2,629,074 times
Reputation: 959
For the purpose of national self-suffiency, it is in the geopolitical interest of the US government for our country to have at least two domestic auto manufacturers. The problem is, they need to have some customers, and the numbers are dwindling of people willing to buy American. Why would I, when I can get a Toyota Camry made in Kentucky?

American companies, in general, care about quarterly profits -- they do not focus on creating customers for life. That is what Toyota has made out of me. I hope some day to buy a brand spanking new Lexus, and there's just no American make that compares right now. Maybe, just maybe, Tesla Motors will produce in large enough numbers for me to consider one of their electrics, five years from now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2008, 06:01 PM
 
Location: Suburbia
8,826 posts, read 15,317,133 times
Reputation: 4533
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdelena View Post
The big three have improved their products but that will not save them.

They have a pension liability that is staggering... they have a relationship with labor that is poison... they have bad contracts with twice as many dealers as they need... they have many more plants than they need... they have bad contracts with suppliers... so they have a business model that will not work going forward regardless of product line-up.

.
I agree with this part. It isn't the quality of the product that is hurting them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top