Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Camaro....I really want to buy one and fix it up .
I've heard some say "go for the 67, original year, options ect...but i've also heard some say the 69' is better because it was restyled that year and more agressive.....
You wouldn't go wrong with either year, but GM did a comprehensive suspension re-design in 1969, oriented more towards handling on asphalt than on soaking up bumps. This being GM, understand that they took a few steps in this direction, they didn't make the cars into Porsches...
So I think the '69 would be the better driver. But I wouldn't turn my nose up at a good '67 or '68 either.
You wouldn't go wrong with either year, but GM did a comprehensive suspension re-design in 1969, oriented more towards handling on asphalt than on soaking up bumps. This being GM, understand that they took a few steps in this direction, they didn't make the cars into Porsches...
So I think the '69 would be the better driver. But I wouldn't turn my nose up at a good '67 or '68 either.
This is my delema as well....I really like the 69's but i'm partial to the 67's....
he's refering to placing the aposterphe after the year number instead of before...
ie 67' vs '67.
It's funny only if you understand the difference...and even then it's not really all that funny.
I prefer the looks of the '67 and '68 but that's just my preference.
omg lol.....get over it.
it's "apostrophe" hahahaha
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.