Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Baseball
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-04-2011, 06:49 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
13,285 posts, read 15,300,979 times
Reputation: 6658

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
filihook..

Well then, I'll just change my previous post from "frequency of advantage in starting pitching" to "frequency of advantage in run prevention."
That's only half of the change that you need to make.

You're still not accounting for the decrease in the run scoring environment of the Coliseum.

A pitcher with a 3.50 ERA in Oakland isn't half a run better at preventing runs than a pitcher with a 4.00 ERA in Boston.

Last edited by filihok; 01-04-2011 at 07:05 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-04-2011, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Cook County
5,289 posts, read 7,487,281 times
Reputation: 3105
I always wondered if they designed Oaklands park with that result in mind or if it was just some dumb design idea that had results they hadn't thought of. It seems super obvious now, but I have never heard of it being the intent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 07:17 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,115,388 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeish View Post
I always wondered if they designed Oaklands park with that result in mind or if it was just some dumb design idea that had results they hadn't thought of. It seems super obvious now, but I have never heard of it being the intent.
No, the design intent of the Coliseum was for containing a football field for the Oakland Raiders. It was constructed in 1962, six years before anyone knew that a MLB team would be relocating to the East Bay. When Finley moved the A's in 1968, the stadium was adapted to hold a baseball field, which is one of the reasons that there is so much foul territory there. It is leftover football field.

Offense is also depressed because the park is right at sea level, the weather is typically cooler than in most ML venues (except across the Bay), and filihok will probably follow this up with data which confirms or disconfirms it, but having attended several hundred games there, it is my conviction that the night time lighting is inferior, reducing offence via reduced visibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Cook County
5,289 posts, read 7,487,281 times
Reputation: 3105
Ahh, ok...that makes sense, though there have been plenty examples of NFL and MLB teams overlapping in certain stadiums without the funky result. I am guessing the difference is they were baseball fields first, as oppose to the NFL field first?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 07:22 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,115,388 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by filihok View Post
That's only half of the change that you need to make.

You're still not accounting for the decrease in the run scoring environment of the Coliseum.

A pitcher with a 3.50 ERA in Oakland isn't half a run better at preventing runs than a pitcher with a 4.00 ERA in Boston.
No longer relevant, I am now speaking of the team's ability to prevent runs, not the pitcher's ability alone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,115,388 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeish View Post
Ahh, ok...that makes sense, though there have been plenty examples of NFL and MLB teams overlapping in certain stadiums without the funky result. I am guessing the difference is they were baseball fields first, as oppose to the NFL field first?
There are examples of both around. Candlestick Park was baseball designed stadium which opened in 1960 and did not host the 49ers until 1971, so it was modified to support football as well. Joe Robbie Stadium in Miami, now called SomeCorporateSponsor Stadium, was built to be the home of the Miami Dolphins, but included just-in-case adaptability to baseball, in anticipation of one day getting a ML franchise, which they did in 1993.

The '70's was the golden era of the multi purpose stadiums such as Three Rivers in Pittsburgh, Riverfront in Cincinnati, Veterans in Philadelphia and the Kingdome in Seattle..all designed for baseball, football, and whatever else you could sell there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 07:50 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
13,285 posts, read 15,300,979 times
Reputation: 6658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
No longer relevant, I am now speaking of the team's ability to prevent runs, not the pitcher's ability alone.
But a team playing against the A's in Oakland also gets the benefit of the Coliseum's run suppression.

So you can't just compare the A's pitching to the league average without factoring in for parks


EDIT: A 3.50 ERA pitcher playing in Oakland with Oakland's defense would not be a 3.50 ERA pitcher playing in Boston with Oakland's defense.

A 4.00 ERA pitcher in Boston with Oakland's defense wouldn't be a 4.00 ERA pitcher in Oakland with Oakland's defense.

Last edited by filihok; 01-04-2011 at 08:02 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 08:17 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,115,388 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by filihok View Post
But a team playing against the A's in Oakland also gets the benefit of the Coliseum's run suppression.

So you can't just compare the A's pitching to the league average without factoring in for parks


.
Sure you can, perhaps not as accurately, but you can.

In fact I already did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 08:20 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
13,285 posts, read 15,300,979 times
Reputation: 6658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
Sure you can, perhaps not as accurately, but you can.

In fact I already did.
Sure...GIGO and all that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2011, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,115,388 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by filihok View Post
Sure...GIGO and all that
I agree, life is like a sewer. What you get out of it depends upon what you put into it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Baseball
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top