Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I voted for the first one, but i don't think this is cool. He will however help out there big men. He will be better than whatever else they could've gotten...kwame brown. But yeah him and Jermaine will be fine so long as they remain healthy.
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,035,535 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by JL
For 1.4 mil this year, that is a steal deal for the Celtics. He can't hurt them. Good move by Boston.
For real? Only 1.4 million?
Agreed, bargain for the Celtics. I think he can put up better than Perkins, I have always felt Perkins to be kind of an anchor for their defense, not at all aggressive enough and does not make any of the shots he attempts.
He doesnt have much value. I don't think this is a good move, regardless of how little they pay him.
I agree but it's really not costing Boston anything so the scales are pretty balanced in the event that Shaq doesn't contribute. However Shaq does want to play another year after this one so he'll probably work his butt off to prove he still has some game left and if he proves good, then Boston will come out on top.
So Boston really doesn't have anything to loose but it would definitely be a steal if they gain.
I agree but it's really not costing Boston anything so the scales are pretty balanced in the event that Shaq doesn't contribute. However Shaq does want to play another year after this one so he'll probably work his butt off to prove he still has some game left and if he proves good, then Boston will come out on top.
So Boston really doesn't have anything to loose but it would definitely be a steal if they gain.
They do have something to lose, just like the Cavs did last year. They will be worse with him on the court, and better with him on the bench. So they will waste valuable minutes on him, the money is arbitrary, this does not make the team better.
They do have something to lose, just like the Cavs did last year. They will be worse with him on the court, and better with him on the bench. So they will waste valuable minutes on him, the money is arbitrary, this does not make the team better.
That was last yr and a different team so you really can't compare the two. I do agree he doesn't necessarily make the team better however there is the POSSIBILITY that he could help Boston when needed and if he does that, then it becomes a win for Boston. At this point you don't know what kind of impact he's going to make. Boston was willing to take a chance and it came at a decent price so now only time will tell.
You can play shaq one on one now which means he is over
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
