Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-13-2012, 08:23 AM
 
193 posts, read 458,628 times
Reputation: 214

Advertisements

One of the big pushes behind Proposition 30 was that the schools would be hugely negatively impacted if it didn’t pass. College students were a specific target group, being told their classes would be cut and their fees would go up if they didn’t vote for Prop 30. However, they were not told that these things would happen anyway, even if Prop 30 was passed.

Delta College in Stockton has just announced the cutback or elimination of many areas of study and many student services next year. Now I will happily grant you that the cuts would almost certainly be more severe if Prop 30 had not passed, but it was presented to the voters in quite a different light.

Among those slated for the axe are banking, carpentry, creative writing, emergency medical services, fire technology and interior design. Athletics is being cut 10%. The library is being cut 7%. Arts, dance, drama and music are being cut 3%. Bonehead math is going away completely.


Quote:
STOCKTON - After Gov. Jerry Brown's tax initiative passed last week, administrators at San Joaquin Delta College exhaled in relief, then immediately went back to work finding millions of dollars in cuts for next year.

Proposition 30 was not a cure-all for school districts and community colleges, if Delta is any indication.

Given all the bad news, how exactly does Prop. 30 help Delta?

It saves classified staff, managers and police officers from 12 furlough days this year. It lessens the severity of future cuts. And, in a strange confluence of events, it allows Delta to actually restore some classes for spring semester even while planning to eliminate entire programs next year.

Delta may cut dozen programs | Recordnet.com
Vote for 30 to protect education and stop the cuts, it's for the kids....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-13-2012, 08:26 AM
 
Location: Declezville, CA
16,806 posts, read 39,955,069 times
Reputation: 17694
Is that a grades 13 and 14 college? Athletics should be cut 100%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2012, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Carmichael, CA
2,410 posts, read 4,458,018 times
Reputation: 4379
Given the economic conditions in Stockton, are you sure that's all about Prop. 30? I attend Foothill College, also a community college, and there will be no cut-backs of any kind there.

American River College in Sacramento has gotten tighter, because the high unemployment in the area has increased older student attendence, but they've announced they're adding SMOG check and repair classes this next term.

I think different parts of California are recovering--or not recovering--at different rates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2012, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,092,270 times
Reputation: 4365
Nobody suggested that Prop 30 was a "cure all", rather the fact that education spending would have to be reduced if Prop 30 wasn't passed.

The governor asked whether we wanted more cuts in education or to pay a bit more taxes, Californians picked the taxes. Why are we still talking about it? Its done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2012, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
702 posts, read 954,504 times
Reputation: 1498
cb, I attend Foothill as well

The main reason we're not seeing any cutbacks like other community colleges is because a huge percentage of our students are international, and they pay considerably more than we do. You also have to factor in that we've received several very generous grants from local companies and investment firms in the past few years (perks of being in silicon valley). We also just got $900,000 from the national science foundation to go towards science, tech, engineering, and math programs... Life is good in Los Altos.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2012, 05:58 PM
 
Location: So Cal
10,033 posts, read 9,510,807 times
Reputation: 10455
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
Nobody suggested that Prop 30 was a "cure all", rather the fact that education spending would have to be reduced if Prop 30 wasn't passed.

The governor asked whether we wanted more cuts in education or to pay a bit more taxes, Californians picked the taxes. Why are we still talking about it? Its done.
Because some are still amazed that there are those who believe the classroom is going to see the money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2012, 06:00 PM
 
Location: Sierra Nevada Land, CA
9,455 posts, read 12,550,968 times
Reputation: 16453
Quote:
Originally Posted by Youthanasia View Post
Delta College in Stockton has just announced the cutback or elimination of many areas of study and many student services next year. Now I will happily grant you that the cuts would almost certainly be more severe if Prop 30 had not passed, but it was presented to the voters in quite a different light.



Vote for 30 to protect education and stop the cuts, it's for the kids....
You sort of summed it up. Prop 30 passing was a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2012, 06:14 PM
 
193 posts, read 458,628 times
Reputation: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr5150 View Post
You sort of summed it up. Prop 30 passing was a good thing.
If you're into the money instead being used for public safety realignment and you work for a local sheriffs dept and will benefit from more jail space being opened for inmates then absolutely, yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2012, 06:19 PM
 
18,172 posts, read 16,406,841 times
Reputation: 9328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Youthanasia View Post
If you're into the money instead being used for public safety realignment and you work for a local sheriffs dept and will benefit from more jail space being opened for inmates then absolutely, yes.
Here is how it works.

They cut some classes instead of using the money for schools and the kids don't get a good education, can't get a job, steal to survive, get caught and .... get a nice new jail cell from the money that was supposed to go to education.

CA is soooo wonderful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-13-2012, 06:40 PM
 
193 posts, read 458,628 times
Reputation: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA View Post
Here is how it works.

They cut some classes instead of using the money for schools and the kids don't get a good education, can't get a job, steal to survive, get caught and .... get a nice new jail cell from the money that was supposed to go to education.

CA is soooo wonderful.

Nah, this is how it really works

SCOTUS says lower population level of inmates in custody

Solution 1 - create more space (new prisons) thus alleviating the overcrowding issue, or Solution 2 - Release inmates, change penal code to make some felonies misdemeanors thus reducing recidivism and mandate that anyone paroled after the realignment program be returned to custody in local jails instead of prison cause, you can't have anymore bodies coming in.

Problem - Local sheriffs depts have been slammed by budget cuts and jail floors have been closed, thus there is nowhere to put violators or new commitments and the public doesn't want to fund incarceration efforts.

Solution to problem - Trick the public into funding your effort indirectly through a hostage initiative, threaten 'trigger cuts' to education if you don't get the money to fund realignment. Make people think that your proposition brings in new money for schools, don't lead onto the fact that no new money is actually going to schools you are merely not going to cut from it, thus you have successfully held education hostage in order to raise the money you need to fund incarceration.

the actual text states

Quote:
"Increases taxes on earnings over $250,000 for seven years and sales taxes by ¼ cent for four years, to fund schools. Guarantees public safety realignment funding. Fiscal Impact: Increased state tax revenues through 2018–19, averaging about $6 billion annually over the next few years. Revenues available for funding state budget. In 2012–13, planned spending reductions, primarily to education programs, would not occur."
The "to fund schools" means they won't cut funding with planned spending reductions, aka 'trigger cuts'.

Brown is intelligent, you don't make it 50 years in politics without learning a few tricks here and there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top