Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-29-2014, 12:02 AM
 
Location: Central Bay Area, CA as of Jan 2010...but still a proud Texan from Houston!
7,484 posts, read 10,447,145 times
Reputation: 8955

Advertisements

Complaint Forces CHP to Remove Lane-Splitting Guidelines from Website | Rider Magazine

What is going on here!??

"The California Highway Patrol and other state government agencies have been forced to remove information from their websites that was intended to help motorcyclists safely execute the allowed lane-splitting maneuver due to a single complaint from a Sacramento man.''

Makes ZERO sense to me
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-29-2014, 12:04 AM
 
Location: Salinas, CA
353 posts, read 426,934 times
Reputation: 313
liability
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2014, 12:09 AM
 
Location: Central Bay Area, CA as of Jan 2010...but still a proud Texan from Houston!
7,484 posts, read 10,447,145 times
Reputation: 8955
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedGray View Post
liability
What do you mean exactly?

Have you looked up the stats for accidents involving motorcyclists that were lane splitting? 11.7% is not as bad as everyday car accidents.

http://www.ots.ca.gov/Media_and_Rese...ing_Survey.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2014, 03:02 AM
 
Location: Someplace Wonderful
5,177 posts, read 4,791,004 times
Reputation: 2587
I've never had a problem with lane slitting and I fail to understand why some people do. It began as a recognition that cycles were not the problem with congestion and fuel consumption.

Like everything else, hateful people are the center of the problem. Open your doors to sabotage. Change lanes without looking. Etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2014, 06:49 AM
jw2
 
2,028 posts, read 3,266,083 times
Reputation: 3387
I think the problem is more that it looks like the CHP is defining law here. Here is the list
  1. Travel at a speed that is no more than 10 MPH faster than other traffic – danger increases at higher speed differentials.
  2. It is not advisable to lane split when traffic flow is at 30 mph or faster — danger increases as overall speed increases.
  3. Typically, it is safer to split between the #1 and #2 lanes than between other lanes.
  4. Consider the total environment in which you are splitting, including the width of the lanes, size of surrounding vehicles, as well as roadway, weather, and lighting conditions.
  5. Be alert and anticipate possible movements by other road users.

Even though they are just recommendations, 1 and 2 especially, look like they are defining law by giving limits. That is not proper for an enforcing agency to define (or give the appearance of defining) what the law is.

Also, any motorcycle riding guidelines should have been made through the DMV
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2014, 07:42 AM
 
Location: Central Bay Area, CA as of Jan 2010...but still a proud Texan from Houston!
7,484 posts, read 10,447,145 times
Reputation: 8955
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckmann View Post
I've never had a problem with lane slitting and I fail to understand why some people do. It began as a recognition that cycles were not the problem with congestion and fuel consumption.

Like everything else, hateful people are the center of the problem. Open your doors to sabotage. Change lanes without looking. Etc.
I also fail to understand why people have issues with lane splitting. I think many are just envious that we don't have to sit in traffic EVER!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2014, 07:50 AM
 
Location: Central Bay Area, CA as of Jan 2010...but still a proud Texan from Houston!
7,484 posts, read 10,447,145 times
Reputation: 8955
Quote:
Originally Posted by jw2 View Post
I think the problem is more that it looks like the CHP is defining law here. Here is the list
  1. Travel at a speed that is no more than 10 MPH faster than other traffic – danger increases at higher speed differentials.
  2. It is not advisable to lane split when traffic flow is at 30 mph or faster — danger increases as overall speed increases.
  3. Typically, it is safer to split between the #1 and #2 lanes than between other lanes.
  4. Consider the total environment in which you are splitting, including the width of the lanes, size of surrounding vehicles, as well as roadway, weather, and lighting conditions.
  5. Be alert and anticipate possible movements by other road users.
Even though they are just recommendations, 1 and 2 especially, look like they are defining law by giving limits. That is not proper for an enforcing agency to define (or give the appearance of defining) what the law is.

Also, any motorcycle riding guidelines should have been made through the DMV
It appears that the spirit of this article is what forced the removal of the information from their website.

Motorcycle lane-splitting rules unveiled - SFGate

According to this article: "Really, it has been limited anarchy out there," said Sgt. Mark Pope, statewide motorcycle safety coordinator for the CHP. "Nobody has provided any guidance, so we decided it was time to figure that out."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2014, 07:57 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,697,144 times
Reputation: 23295
It's the same BS with gunlaws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2014, 01:59 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,461,212 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by TVC15 View Post
Complaint Forces CHP to Remove Lane-Splitting Guidelines from Website | Rider Magazine

What is going on here!??

"The California Highway Patrol and other state government agencies have been forced to remove information from their websites that was intended to help motorcyclists safely execute the allowed lane-splitting maneuver due to a single complaint from a Sacramento man.''

Makes ZERO sense to me
The guy who forced their removal is a well-known scammer and professional busybody whose ultimate intent -- going by the verbiage in his "petition" in which he claims that lane-splitting frightens car drivers -- is undoubtedly to make it illegal once and for all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2014, 02:50 PM
 
Location: Under the Redwoods
3,751 posts, read 7,672,460 times
Reputation: 6118
Oh dear....in this, what some call nanny state, I think we are the last state to allow lane splitting. To see that go because of one person would be sad.

I don't see the problem with having the guidelines out there and accessible. They should be easily available so that riders will know how do lane split in a safe manner.
I knew lane splitting was legal when I started driving over 30 years ago, but had no clue about the 10 mph thing until there was a debate in the home about lane splitting (it's legal, no it's not, yes it is!). So I looked it up to prove the legality of it and with that came very helpful guidelines. The motorcycle rider was happy to know the perameters of lane splitting.

Now that those are gone, will there be more accidents because riders don't know the rules?
And guidelines are just that, not laws...I see nothing wrong or having to do with any 'liability' in presenting guidelines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top