Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-20-2015, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,528,052 times
Reputation: 38576

Advertisements

There has been recent discussion about desalinating ocean water in order to provide enough water for the ag industry in CA, because we are, after all, The Beadbasket of the Nation (to be said with a loud amphitheater echo).

Let's pretend for a minute, that the law changed, and there was no longer water for the giant ag industry farms in CA. And it was not allowed or possible to take water from the ocean, or to divert any of the water in the aquaduct systems, or to pump water into the state from any other state or nation.

So, the ag industry in CA dies. With no hope of revival.

Where would the nation then get it's food?

How would this truly affect life for most of the citizens of CA? Or the rest of the nation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-20-2015, 08:00 AM
 
3,155 posts, read 2,705,167 times
Reputation: 11985
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoMoreSnowForMe View Post
Where would the nation then get it's food?

How would this truly affect life for most of the citizens of CA?
China. Or, grown in south america, packaged in China. Regardless, higher prices, heavy metal, virus, and bacteria contamination would become commonplace.

Less economic activity for CA. No more 1 dollar local produce at the 99 cent store that is too ripe to ship to Boston or some other frozen hellhole.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2015, 08:24 AM
 
Location: On the water.
21,741 posts, read 16,369,041 times
Reputation: 19836
California isn't really the "breadbasket of America", as "bread" refers to the almighty grains that comprise the largest part of American diets. And the majority of that wheat and corn comes from other states. However, California IS the nation's biggest supplier of fruit and vegetable produce - and nuts (excluding peanuts, which are legumes, not nuts).

That said, we already get a lot of produce from Mexico. That would be the greatest increased supplier, obviously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2015, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Buena Park, Orange County, California
1,424 posts, read 2,490,144 times
Reputation: 1547
Quote:
Originally Posted by wac_432 View Post
China. Or, grown in south america, packaged in China. Regardless, higher prices, heavy metal, virus, and bacteria contamination would become commonplace.

Less economic activity for CA. No more 1 dollar local produce at the 99 cent store that is too ripe to ship to Boston or some other frozen hellhole.
Only 10% of China is arable land, it used to be able to sufficiently provide for itself, but now it is a net importer of grains from other countries, with nations like Brazil serving as its own personal Wal-mart of raw resources. Plus, China has much of the same issues as California with water shortages.

Also, I don't think the second part is necessarily true. The USA is still a big enough economic power to influence safety and food production policies in other countries, and if we started importing more fruits and vegetables, I'm sure the American market would demand for quality produce, or shift to a country that could provide it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2015, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Oroville, California
3,477 posts, read 6,515,659 times
Reputation: 6796
California is the produce stand for America. That said, the production would shift to Arizona, Texas, Oregon, FL for some crops and Chile, Australia, South Africa and Mexico for others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2015, 12:38 PM
 
Location: Orange County, CA
807 posts, read 898,779 times
Reputation: 1391
Quote:
Originally Posted by RudyOD View Post
Only 10% of China is arable land, it used to be able to sufficiently provide for itself, but now it is a net importer of grains from other countries, with nations like Brazil serving as its own personal Wal-mart of raw resources. Plus, China has much of the same issues as California with water shortages.

Also, I don't think the second part is necessarily true. The USA is still a big enough economic power to influence safety and food production policies in other countries, and if we started importing more fruits and vegetables, I'm sure the American market would demand for quality produce, or shift to a country that could provide it.
Or even bring limited farming back to California for specialty, premium grade produce even if it is expensive due to a hypothetically high price of water. Having a market means having people willing to pay the price.

If the exercise is about all farming becoming non-existent in California, I would imagine some of the southern states could expand their agricultural activity to pick up the slack. As a very broad generalization, many politically conservative states are heavily dependent on the agriculture industry. Therefore it should be logical to expect them to make the effort to expand that industry when an opportunity arrives. The one question I have about this idea is the thought that if they had the ability to do so for the same variety of produce that California grows, then it would have already happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2015, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Buena Park, Orange County, California
1,424 posts, read 2,490,144 times
Reputation: 1547
My biggest concern would actually be on the quality of our cuisine, aha. In all seriousness though, California is a trend setter, and this includes food. Locovore (farm to table), slow food movement, fresh produce...are all reasons why California cuisine has an international following, and it has influence global gastronomy, like the Nordic kitchen, to focus on being creative with locally produced ingredients. The vast variety of produce that is grown here and our year round growing seasons also allows chefs to be creative with an astonishing of amount of locally grown ingredients.

It's funny, when people are considering moving to California, they mostly focus on the climate, but little take into account its gastronomic offerings, which really can only be compared to countries like Italy and France. I mean, half the best part of living in San Francisco is that you have wine country right next to it, and a collection of some of the world's best restaurants. Plus, it's hard to imagine life without California avocados and almonds (I'm a heavy almond milk drinker) lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2015, 02:36 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,219 posts, read 107,999,816 times
Reputation: 116179
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeauCharles View Post
California is the produce stand for America. That said, the production would shift to Arizona, Texas, Oregon, FL for some crops and Chile, Australia, South Africa and Mexico for others.
Production wouldn't shift to AZ and TX, because those states are drying up. it might shift to WA State, and maybe some of the SE states. Those ag areas would be a lot more susceptible to natural disasters, though; hurricanes and such.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2015, 08:22 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,528,052 times
Reputation: 38576
Quote:
Originally Posted by RudyOD View Post
Only 10% of China is arable land, it used to be able to sufficiently provide for itself, but now it is a net importer of grains from other countries, with nations like Brazil serving as its own personal Wal-mart of raw resources. Plus, China has much of the same issues as California with water shortages.

Also, I don't think the second part is necessarily true. The USA is still a big enough economic power to influence safety and food production policies in other countries, and if we started importing more fruits and vegetables, I'm sure the American market would demand for quality produce, or shift to a country that could provide it.
This is a good point. I have a friend who works in a lab in Yolo County, where they are an FDA testing facility. They get all kinds of things from vitamins to fresh blueberries to you-name-it that is being either produced in the US or imported here. They test for pesticides, etc.

No doubt they can't catch everything, but there is a process in place to see if the imported goods are in compliance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DriveNotCommute View Post
Or even bring limited farming back to California for specialty, premium grade produce even if it is expensive due to a hypothetically high price of water. Having a market means having people willing to pay the price.

If the exercise is about all farming becoming non-existent in California, I would imagine some of the southern states could expand their agricultural activity to pick up the slack. As a very broad generalization, many politically conservative states are heavily dependent on the agriculture industry. Therefore it should be logical to expect them to make the effort to expand that industry when an opportunity arrives. The one question I have about this idea is the thought that if they had the ability to do so for the same variety of produce that California grows, then it would have already happened.
I wonder about that. It would be like a mom and pop store going up against Walmart, in a way. The ag businesses here are huge, and highly subsidized as I understand it. If that CA cheap competition was to disappear, I just wonder if some places who couldn't compete, would throw their hat in the ring, so to speak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2015, 08:44 PM
 
2,645 posts, read 3,332,820 times
Reputation: 7358
What about replacing half the corn crops in the middle of America with more food crops?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top