Where in California do you see Hispanics being replaced by Whites and Asians? (Salinas: neighborhood, rated)

[the city]

I don't think it's a matter of race, but a matter of income. I think more europeans, affluent mexican-americans, and wealthy asian-americans are moving to SF. While lower socio economic minorities are getting pushed farther inland.

[Oldglory]

I seriously doubt that Hispanics are being replaced in any area of California and especially So. Calif. because of continued illegal immigration. Asians and most whites don't breed like there is no tomorrow either. Reading the local births in my area most of the babies born have Hispanic surnames.

[mrsltd]

Originally Posted by Snort

Weiner Schnitzel's pledge to rule the fast food industry for a thousand years went awry when they overdid the subliminal messaging on their muzak boxes with their rendition of "Weiner Schnitzel Uber Alles".

That would be "Wiener", but.......

[mrsltd]

Originally Posted by Dave Coe

There is a lot of talk of the Hispanicization of California. However there are some places that are the exception to that trend. In Echo Park and Hollywood in LA and the Mission in SF Hispanics are being replaced by White Hipsters. In El Monte working class Hispanics are being replaced by Chinese who are being priced out of Monterrey Park. I also see Hispanic Areas turning Asian over time in the Eastern San Gabriel Valley, West Covina, Pomona, Northern Orange County, and parts of the East Bay such as Hayward and San Leandro.

California as an entity started out "Hispanic".

[mrsltd]

Originally Posted by V8 Vega

Is SF San Francisco or San Fernando?

SF is "San Francisco" in this thread.

[Snort]

Originally Posted by mrsltd

That would be "Wiener", but.......

Don't you dare touch my weiner!

[Tulemutt]

Originally Posted by Snort

Don't you dare touch my weiner!

Huma? Is that you?

[Oldglory]

Originally Posted by mrsltd

California as an entity started out "Hispanic".

Spanish colonial/Mexican/Latino influences was always a "minor" part of California after it became part of the U.S. since 1848 and its statehood in 1850.

[Dave Coe]

Originally Posted by mrsltd

California as an entity started out "Hispanic".

Not quite. First were the Natives, than the Spaniards, than the Englos, than the Mexicans and Asians. Hispanics are a mix of Spanish and Aztec. Aztecs never colonized California.

[BeauCharles]

Originally Posted by rah

For the record, while the hispanic population in the mission district has been dropping due to gentrification (which has gotten lots of media attention), the hispanic population in SF as a whole is rising, and has been doing so nonstop since at least 1940. Percentage-wise, SF probably hasn't been this hispanic since back when it was literally part of spain/mexico (though it was obviously a tiny village back then).

And they're still only 15% of San Francisco's population and that just 1% higher than it was 30 years ago. Its lower than the percentage of the US population for Hispanics (16.1%) A million dollar average home price and $3,000 a month rent for a one bedroom is kind of tough to come up with for a service worker (which many are).

Originally Posted by mrsltd

California as an entity started out "Hispanic".

It was indigenous for thousands of years and inland Central and Northern California (South of Sonoma, east of the Coast Range) was never really Spanish or Mexican beyond a general territorial "claim". The Sierra Nevada gold fields, the far North Coast and Central Valley were settled by Americans after the war with Mexico. The Spanish/Mexicans didn't originally settle them.