Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-30-2009, 02:39 PM
 
46 posts, read 126,941 times
Reputation: 29

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeCalifornia View Post
Knowing how stupid the state is, they'll furlough workers, then pay OT to others, costing us even more money.
The way I understand it to be is those facilities working on a 24/7 days a week will still get a 10% cut in salary but will be required to work their regular schedule. The difference is they will either be asked to take their two days a month off any given day or they can bank their time and use it as vacation before June 2010. In either case we will be forced to be short staff and cut 10% of our resources.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-30-2009, 02:45 PM
 
Location: RSM
5,113 posts, read 19,766,781 times
Reputation: 1927
Quote:
Originally Posted by lexi View Post
"The governor wants the furloughs to remain in place even if he and lawmakers reach a budget agreement that addresses the deficit. The equivalent of a 9% pay cut, the move will save the state about $1.3 billion through June 30, 2010, officials said."

He didn't want to lay people off... wouldn't it be better to lay off some people, they could get another
job instead of slow bleeding all state employee's.
i think part of the debate is if he has the power to do that. it took a court ruling to say he had the power to furlough, and thats not even close to a layoff
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2009, 05:06 PM
 
215 posts, read 1,534,387 times
Reputation: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by momojojo View Post
A judge just tentatively sided with Arnold on furloughing state employess 2 fridays per month. Looks like I get next Friday off. Time to tighten (again) the ol' belt.
So did they lower every ones salary by 2 days?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2009, 06:19 PM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,680,034 times
Reputation: 23268
The same thing was common place in the 1930's...

The only difference were married men supporting a family were the last to go... Single Men and Women and Women with a working Husband were let go first... Priority was given status was given to Head of Household.

My Grandfather told me the boss came out to the shop floor and explained the situation... not like he and the other workers didn't know jobs coming into the shop had slowed down to a trickle...

The workers voted unanimously not to lay-off or fire anyone and asked the Boss to reduce everyone's hours untill more jobs came in... Fortunately, things picked up a little bit about 9 months later... they didn't have a new hires for many years.

Lots of the men started Vegetable Gardens with their extra time...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2009, 02:10 AM
 
46 posts, read 126,941 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockhetHD View Post
So did they lower every ones salary by 2 days?
We will begin to take our two days off in February but will not see a pay cut until the end of the month.

So to answer your question, yes they did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2009, 02:15 AM
 
46 posts, read 126,941 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by lexi View Post
"The governor wants the furloughs to remain in place even if he and lawmakers reach a budget agreement that addresses the deficit. The equivalent of a 9% pay cut, the move will save the state about $1.3 billion through June 30, 2010, officials said."

He didn't want to lay people off... wouldn't it be better to lay off some people, they could get another
job instead of slow bleeding all state employee's.
I am a state employee. I feel blessed I am not getting laid off. I would rather give up some of my hours to avoid more people getting laid off. The less people without a job, less families in crisis, less people in unemployment and less people in welfare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2009, 06:02 PM
 
1,175 posts, read 1,786,133 times
Reputation: 1182
Its about friggen time......


Take a bite of the GIGANTIC s..t sandwich that you all helped make.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2009, 06:48 PM
 
9,725 posts, read 15,172,833 times
Reputation: 3346
The last company I worked for would routinely cut workers' hours back, then they would start cutting hourly wages 10%. And if that wasn't enough, they'd cut wages another 10%.

Government workers are lucky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top