Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm not surprised you haven't heard about it, the establishment took delight in destroying his research papers, his laboratory, and thus the man himself because he wouldn't sell out to the establishment. Like so many other *real* researchers who fell foul of the establishment. Their names and achievements have been buried and all but lost to history.
Who invented the first microscope which had the ability to study *living* viruses etc....RRR. I wonder if that's widely known and/or mentioned in education facilities today.
Bjorn Nordenstrom is another name to look up, Dr Robert O Becker is another. It's all extremely interesting stuff.
It should be noted that the methods in your links are much different from what Rife and his proponents postulated.
The problem with using any radiofrequency current in the body is controlling its effects. The procedure used in your first link targets a specific tumor.
The procedure in the second link requires finding a technique that will allow the current to be applied to the entire body and only heat up cancer cells.
Both methods are intriguing. The one in the Mayo Clinic link is actually available now. The one in the NCI link is not yet ready for prime time.
Rife's claims were discredited because his "microscope" did not do what he said it would.
His "generator" was not much more than a 9 volt battery.
It should be noted that the methods in your links are much different from what Rife and his proponents postulated.
The problem with using any radiofrequency current in the body is controlling its effects. The procedure used in your first link targets a specific tumor.
The procedure in the second link requires finding a technique that will allow the current to be applied to the entire body and only heat up cancer cells.
Both methods are intriguing. The one in the Mayo Clinic link is actually available now. The one in the NCI link is not yet ready for prime time.
Rife's claims were discredited because his "microscope" did not do what he said it would.
His "generator" was not much more than a 9 volt battery.
Anyone selling a Rife generator is a quack.
Exactly. Again, scientific skepticism is a great thing. It is what gives us new treatments that actually work.
The Rife generator is a quack, which was easy to spot at first blush. The field as a whole shows great potential. When science is properly applied and tested.
My very close childhood friend used this method to treat her ovarian cancer (she refused chemo and radiation). She died two years ago. Nothing that any of her family and friends said would dissuade her from her hope that it would be effective.
what the establishment have destroy every thing. that's why we don't see this treatement now a days. may be some day some one bring this treatment in light for every one to stay healthy.
The reason the method was discredited was because it did not work.
Wait, research, testing and retesting, peer reviews are how advances in treatment are made. A scientific skeptic tends to follow that pattern. That is where the success' are being found.
So for the most part there is potential, as some are presenting here has been tested and proven false. There is no conspiracy.
The reason the method was discredited was because it did not work.
It did work. Study up on Rife...
From published article "Royal Raymond Rife & the Cancer Cure that Worked"
Quote: {In 1934, Mr. Royal Rife and his associates opened 2 small clinics in California and cured sixteen cases of cancer. Sworn affidavits and medical experts testified to the complete remission...}
Then study up on a certain Dr Morris Fishbein...
From published article "Morris Fishbein - AMA enemy of American Health"
Quote: {The worst of Fishbein's sins was his destruction of Royal Rife.}
Follow up on these two and you'll get a clearer picture of why Rifes' name has faded into obscurity! If one is sceptical, that's fine, and even prudent, but there is much past research that is extremely interesting, and exciting if it were ever to be permitted to continue.
It was determined that Rife nothing more than a mid level marketing scheme. The devices sold and promoted are unregistered, potentially dangerous and lack any therapeutic value.
You advocate being a skeptic. Yet, when the tests are applied, the theories this quack promotes do not hold water. A reasonable person would say, thanks for playing. Others cry conspiracy. They try to deny the evidence and cannot provide and evidence to support their theories. At best, they might be able to claim a placebo
If these claims and machines work, you'd see their use in medicine. To claim it is a coverup is insulting to who are healers. It shows your own limited view. radionics - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
