Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Cancer
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-24-2017, 02:27 PM
 
15,590 posts, read 15,684,170 times
Reputation: 21999

Advertisements

This was an article about efforts to use the body's own immune system, which sounded like an promising route.

The T-Cell Army
Can the body’s immune response help treat cancer?

By Jerome Groopman
The New Yorker

The T-Cell Army - The New Yorker
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-28-2017, 04:34 PM
 
11,558 posts, read 12,059,051 times
Reputation: 17758
There was a documentary on TV regarding utilizing the patient's T cells to kill the cancer cells. It had to do with harvesting the cells in a lab and when there were upwards of a million T cells they were reintroduced into the patient.

The success rate was amazing. The problem is the exorbitant cost that insurance won't touch so they limited the treatment to a few terminal patients who had not had any success with chemo/radiation.

There's the theory about the origin of cancer cells - the microbes in healthy cells that turn malignant and what energizes them into reproducing at a rapid rate. Apparently the normal treatments of chemo/radiation was not the answer to stopping the root cause of cancer, and why it would return years later.

https://www.cancertutor.com/what_causes_cancer/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2017, 05:12 PM
 
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
10,363 posts, read 7,995,858 times
Reputation: 27773
^^^The above link is nonsense. There are no microbes in cancer cells (or in regular cells, either). Cancer is caused by genetic mutations (some inherited, some which occur sporadically as people age) which lead to dysregulation of growth, so the cells don't respond to normal 'stop growing' signals sent by the body.

And while immune therapy shows a lot of promise, it doesn't work for all types of cancer, and it has significant side effects (up to and including death) that can be every bit as dangerous as chemotherapy and radiation treatment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2017, 05:42 PM
 
11,558 posts, read 12,059,051 times
Reputation: 17758
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aredhel View Post
^^^The above link is nonsense. There are no microbes in cancer cells (or in regular cells, either). Cancer is caused by genetic mutations (some inherited, some which occur sporadically as people age) which lead to dysregulation of growth, so the cells don't respond to normal 'stop growing' signals sent by the body.

And while immune therapy shows a lot of promise, it doesn't work for all types of cancer, and it has significant side effects (up to and including death) that can be every bit as dangerous as chemotherapy and radiation treatment.
I agree that it seems far fetched to imagine we could have microbes that result in cancerous cells. There's so much we don't know, so much we haven't heard/read and so much we aren't being told.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC154404/

http://www.the-scientist.com/?articl...s-Meet-Cancer/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2017, 07:00 PM
 
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
10,363 posts, read 7,995,858 times
Reputation: 27773
Quote:
Originally Posted by katie45 View Post
I agree that it seems far fetched to imagine we could have microbes that result in cancerous cells. There's so much we don't know, so much we haven't heard/read and so much we aren't being told.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC154404/

http://www.the-scientist.com/?articl...s-Meet-Cancer/
Neither of those links support the idea of cancer cells containing microbes. Rather, they discuss how microbes that are external to the body's cells interact with the the cells which are integral to our bodies (such as the cells lining our digestive tract) and influence the activity of those cells (something we've known about for quite a while, but haven't studied deeply until quite recently).

The OP's post is discussing something quite different: using drugs that act on the immune system's regulatory pathways (particularly PD-1/PD-L1 pathway) to stimulate T-cell activity in the hopes the activated T-cells will attack and kill the cancer cells. This is proving to be a a promising therapy for quite a few cancers, but it has the unfortunate (but if you think about it, predicable) side effect of causing serious autoimmune disease in some of the patients receiving the drugs. So it's an important advance, but it's in no way the cancer-specific (and harmless to all other tissues) miracle cure we all want to see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2017, 07:20 PM
 
9,576 posts, read 7,341,016 times
Reputation: 14004
I remember when the pediatric oncologists at CHOP (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia) started doing clinical human trials in children with certain blood cancers years ago using their modified T-cells, and even the doctors had no idea if it would work, in theory it should have, but when you're dealing with something as complex as the human body, there are no guarantees.

I think the first few patients, were literal on the edge of death multiple times, before the treatment started to work. And like others have mentioned, it ain't cheap, only works against certain types of cancers and it doesn't have a 100% success rate, but if you have the money and it's your last option, might as well try it, if you're going to be dead sooner rather than later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-29-2017, 08:45 AM
 
11,558 posts, read 12,059,051 times
Reputation: 17758
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjseliga View Post
I remember when the pediatric oncologists at CHOP (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia) started doing clinical human trials in children with certain blood cancers years ago using their modified T-cells, and even the doctors had no idea if it would work, in theory it should have, but when you're dealing with something as complex as the human body, there are no guarantees.

I think the first few patients, were literal on the edge of death multiple times, before the treatment started to work. And like others have mentioned, it ain't cheap, only works against certain types of cancers and it doesn't have a 100% success rate, but if you have the money and it's your last option, might as well try it, if you're going to be dead sooner rather than later.
This!! Excellent posting and you're spot on! Those patients were at the point that nothing else was working.

Wish I could rep you more than one point!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2017, 05:49 PM
 
9,576 posts, read 7,341,016 times
Reputation: 14004
Here's an article from today:

Revolutionary gene therapy approved for leukemia — at $475,000 price tag
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2017, 08:27 AM
 
11,558 posts, read 12,059,051 times
Reputation: 17758
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjseliga View Post

Exactly!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2017, 12:55 PM
 
3,886 posts, read 3,508,782 times
Reputation: 5296
The other big problem with immunological approaches to cancer is durability of response. While the approach has done wonders for blood cancers, remissions with solid tumors typically lasts only a few months. There are good reasons why this is so. One quite surprising result from sequencing solid tumors is how genetically unstable they are. This means they can quickly mutate to resistance to a particular drug. By the time a patient finishes a third line treament, the treatments have selected for the fastest growing, most resistant cells. That's why things can be reasonably stable for a long time before going quickly down hill.

So many things in biomedicine seem to be over-hyped these days. I envision an army of PR folks, not just at companies, but at medical schools, announcing every slight discovery, speculating about the value (as any good press release would do), and misleading the public. Maybe I'm overly cynical, but nothing else explains the " boots but no cowboy"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Cancer
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top