Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I never saw a reason for "actress"--it has nothing to do with politics or "liberation," either; it's silly. I also never used "aviatrix," or "executrix." What nonsense.
I do see "actress" remaining, for example, in awards categories, where I don't see them grouping together awards for both sexes, or adopting a "female actor" category.
As with many other things that which is associated with men derives a higher status.
For most of history actresses were women considered no better than they should be; practically one step (if that) away from the street.
Yes, some like Lille Langtry achieved great success on stage, and did mingle with "society". However the profession still attached rather low connotations so women were seen as something close to or near a prostitute. Thus many families didn't exactly welcome their sons marrying an actress.
Gender neutral and or just using the male version for a profession has been taking hold since the 1970's or maybe 1980's and is seen across the board.
Actor: it's not a person, it's not a gender, it's a job. Now all you stunt women line up over here.
Acting is a job--performed by actors (people).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.