Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-07-2010, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Chicago
15,586 posts, read 27,621,939 times
Reputation: 1761

Advertisements

7/28/10

"...Lawmakers will likely increase the personal tax to 5 percent from 3 percent, generating $6 billion of new revenue, the budget director, David Vaught, said in an interview..."

Illinois Will Probably Raise Income-Tax Rate to 5%, Budget Director Says - Bloomberg

That is more than a 50% hike. That is a 66.7 % hike.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-07-2010, 01:59 PM
 
Location: Nort Seid
5,288 posts, read 8,883,929 times
Reputation: 2459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avengerfire View Post
7/28/10

"...Lawmakers will likely increase the personal tax to 5 percent from 3 percent, generating $6 billion of new revenue, the budget director, David Vaught, said in an interview..."

Illinois Will Probably Raise Income-Tax Rate to 5%, Budget Director Says - Bloomberg

That is more than a 50% hike. That is a 66.7 % hike.
Interesting there is no mention of the exemption, I wonder if they've dropped it.

And I'm not thrilled to be paying more taxes, but the alternative isn't acceptable - the state of Illinois is broke as a joke, there really aren't any cost-cutting measures that can remotely close the gap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Chicago - Logan Square
3,396 posts, read 7,213,531 times
Reputation: 3731
As I understand it the current proposal exempts the first $50,000 of income from the tax hike, making the State income tax at least somewhat progressive. While I'm not crazy about a tax hike, the income tax rate will still be significantly less for me than any other place in the US I would consider living (NYC, SF, Boston, DC, and others).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Nort Seid
5,288 posts, read 8,883,929 times
Reputation: 2459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Attrill View Post
As I understand it the current proposal exempts the first $50,000 of income from the tax hike, making the State income tax at least somewhat progressive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 07:30 PM
 
77 posts, read 160,685 times
Reputation: 61
Illinois is backwards because of the extremely high regressive taxes like sales and sin taxes, those that disproportionately affect the poor. I'm fine with jacking up income taxes on the rich (hell, I might even be affected.) Those that profit from the system should pay it back; it certainly won't affect my desire to do a good job at work so I don't buy into that argument at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 08:15 PM
 
8 posts, read 6,004 times
Reputation: 10
Default Oops!

Moderato error: Message truncated.

Last edited by linicx; 09-08-2010 at 01:07 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2010, 06:05 AM
 
Location: Not where you ever lived
11,535 posts, read 30,269,957 times
Reputation: 6426
I think we should 1% increase in grocery tax only except where it already exceeds*the current 1%. It affects all, not targeted to just one group. I get a double wammy on the booze and cigarette tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2010, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Nort Seid
5,288 posts, read 8,883,929 times
Reputation: 2459
Quote:
Originally Posted by linicx View Post
I think we should 1% increase in grocery tax only except where it already exceeds*the current 1%. It affects all, not targeted to just one group. I get a double wammy on the booze and cigarette tax.
I don't think that's going to put much of a dent in the structural deficit problem. Illinois really is in pretty bad shape (not that we're alone in this category by a long shot).

It's always interesting to me to compare Wisconsin's state government with ours - why is ours so much worse? Best arguments I've heard are we just never got the housecleaning Wisconsin had a century or so ago, and then there's the Chicago Machine problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2010, 03:51 PM
 
Location: Portland OR
2,662 posts, read 3,860,262 times
Reputation: 4881
Chi-Town native.

Lived in WI. for the first 47 years of my life. I do not feel that I am getting anything less from gov't in IL that I did not get in WI. WI raped me a lot more that IL does on taxes and fees.


Further, when you peel back the onion, WI politicians are not any different than IL politicians. Frankly I would rather vote for a relatively open crook who does not deny what he/she does rather than the lying shills in Madison who routinely say they are not like IL politicians, while they line their pockets with road builder money, teachers union money, ridiculous per diem compensation and the list goes on and on.

I am not saying what I see in IL is great, but I do not understand why people buy the baloney coming out of Madison that it is all "honest" government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2010, 06:02 PM
 
2,300 posts, read 6,185,102 times
Reputation: 1744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avengerfire View Post
Insulting, absurd, ridiculous. Yes, let's give up control of the lottery in exchange for a one time payment that might last 6 months at best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top