Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: WHICH SOUTHERN CITY GOT LEFT IN THE DUST?
Birmingham AL 36 35.29%
Jackson MS 28 27.45%
Little Rock AR 9 8.82%
Shreveport LA 2 1.96%
Memphis TN 13 12.75%
Greenville SC 4 3.92%
Macon GA 10 9.80%
Voters: 102. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-01-2010, 07:51 PM
 
Location: Savannah GA
13,709 posts, read 21,935,779 times
Reputation: 10227

Advertisements

Which Southern city was asleep at the wheel, missed the boat, got left in the dust and will likely forever be stuck in 2nd or 3rd tier status?

Put another way: Which city missed the Sunbelt boom and will likely never catch up to Charlotte, Nashville, Orlando or Austin, much less Atlanta, Dallas or Houston?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-01-2010, 08:44 PM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,486,476 times
Reputation: 12187
I've always heard Birmingham used to be on par with Atlanta, but while lacking compared to Atown B'ham is still way ahead of Jackson & Shreveport.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 08:54 PM
 
14,256 posts, read 26,957,786 times
Reputation: 4565
I agree, Birmingham is eons ahead of Jackson MS. I've been to both, Birmingham is growing and coming of age right now. Jackson MS was depressing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 08:54 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,527,896 times
Reputation: 5884
birmingham, look at birmingham atlanta circa 1950 and now. atlanta grew up, birmingham shrunk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 09:00 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,759,909 times
Reputation: 17399
Maybe these cities won't be left behind. Maybe they'll just develop later. Greenville and Spartanburg in South Carolina are already doing this. The I-85 corridor between Atlanta and the Research Triangle in North Carolina is a corridor of explosive growth. Upstate South Carolina is centrally located between the two premier cities in the Atlantic South.

Anyway, of the cities that were listed, the one that I think has the longest way to go is Macon, GA. Most people who move to middle Georgia these days choose to live in Perry or Warner Robins; meanwhile, Macon slowly deteriorates. Maybe proximity to Atlanta will help Macon recover someday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 09:11 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,640,475 times
Reputation: 3870
Jacksonville might be my choice. It has a decent location - it could serve as a "gateway" into Florida - and it has a metro area large enough to create some of its own economic weather.

But it doesn't seem to be doing all that much with itself. It might well lose its NFL franchise. Downtown is somewhat improved over the past, but it certainly isn't a hub of anything.

Jackson, MS is also a laggard by the standards of Birmingham or Memphis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 09:29 PM
 
Location: New Orleans
128 posts, read 298,422 times
Reputation: 82
left behind what?

What's so special about Atlanta and Dallas? They're a lot bigger than these other "left behind" cities, but bigger isn't necessarily better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 10:01 PM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,876,413 times
Reputation: 2698
Gotta say Birmingham, but I think it would be worthwhile to discuss some other cities not listed here like Richmond, Louisville, Charleston, and Jacksonville.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 10:11 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,527,896 times
Reputation: 5884
Quote:
Originally Posted by tablemtn View Post
Jacksonville might be my choice. It has a decent location - it could serve as a "gateway" into Florida - and it has a metro area large enough to create some of its own economic weather.

But it doesn't seem to be doing all that much with itself. It might well lose its NFL franchise. Downtown is somewhat improved over the past, but it certainly isn't a hub of anything.

Jackson, MS is also a laggard by the standards of Birmingham or Memphis.
Jacksonville too, it used to have movie studios.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2010, 10:13 PM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,260 posts, read 8,766,661 times
Reputation: 693
Birmingham, Alabama
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top