Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They must have a different definition of "Downtown San Francisco" than your average SF resident then...here's a very close representation of downtown SF using census tracts (outlined in red):
^that's around 2-3 square miles, and includes the Financial District, Union Square, the Tenderloin, Civic Center, Nob Hill, parts of SOMA, and parts of Chinatown.
As you can see, the population is nearly twice what brookings counted. These stats I posted are from 2000 also, so downtown SF's population is definitely higher now.
I would agree, spending a lot of time in SF, to me it is definately one of the 5 top downtowns, especially on feel
NYC is the obvious #1
Then Chicago
But to me Philly/Bsoton/SF are all pretty close - the top tier from Brookings made perfect sense with the exception of SF being excluded.
1. New York
2. Chicago
3. San Francisco
4. Philadelphia
5. Boston
6. Washington
7. Miami
8. Seattle
9. Los Angeles
10. Minneapolis
Houston, Atlanta, Dallas, Denver, Pittsburgh, and San Diego all deserve recognition as well. The latter 3 already have good downtown areas. The former three have huge buildings and somewhat-active downtowns, but they seem to be improving quickly.
In all honesty, though, I don't consider Cincy to be anything that impressive.
lol. Good one. I hope your joking.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.