Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-30-2010, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,693 posts, read 9,939,641 times
Reputation: 3448

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wsobchak View Post
Life isn't about "skylines", it's about people.

So, would you rather live in the 21st Century with "Minnesota Nice" progressives, or live in a 14th Century, Dark Ages theocracy?

With the possible exception of Austin, I couldn't imagine any morally-decent person wanting to live in Texas.
Oh, Lord...........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-30-2010, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Minneapolis (St. Louis Park)
5,993 posts, read 10,184,408 times
Reputation: 4407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallaz View Post
No, I'm telling the truth. If you don't believe me ask other Dallasites. You can see it that far, because parts of Dallas County is flat.
LOL, I know, I just thought it was ironic. I'm sure you can see Dallas further away. For one, Minneapolis is hilly in spots because of the river banks, so it's tough to see over those hills on the other side of those banks. Dallas is pretty flat, from what I see/hear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,693 posts, read 9,939,641 times
Reputation: 3448
Quote:
Originally Posted by Min-Chi-Cbus View Post
LOL, I know, I just thought it was ironic. I'm sure you can see Dallas further away. For one, Minneapolis is hilly in spots because of the river banks, so it's tough to see over those hills on the other side of those banks. Dallas is pretty flat, from what I see/hear.
It's not completely flat. In Southern Dallas County it's really hilly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Minneapolis (St. Louis Park)
5,993 posts, read 10,184,408 times
Reputation: 4407
A city has to be flat to see the skyline from 30 miles away...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,693 posts, read 9,939,641 times
Reputation: 3448
Quote:
Originally Posted by Min-Chi-Cbus View Post
A city has to be flat to see the skyline from 30 miles away...
It is, but the only hilly part is Southern Dallas County.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 12:07 PM
 
Location: MN
3,971 posts, read 9,674,523 times
Reputation: 2148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallaz View Post
When they started to build their skyline, the city wasn't that small. The biggest population was 521,718.

Um. Have you seen the MPLS skyline in the 1980s?

Capella Tower and Wells Fargo Center were built in 1992 and 1988 respectively.



Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 12:13 PM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,693 posts, read 9,939,641 times
Reputation: 3448
Quote:
Originally Posted by knke0204 View Post
Um. Have you seen the MPLS skyline in the 1980s?

Capella Tower and Wells Fargo Center were built in 1992 and 1988 respectively.


Have you seen pics of Dallas in the 70s and 80s?









Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 12:23 PM
 
Location: MN
3,971 posts, read 9,674,523 times
Reputation: 2148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallaz View Post
Have you seen pics of Dallas in the 70s and 80s?

Hey, I'm not the one who said that Dallas' skyline was built when their population was way higher.

You said "Well yeah, but their population in MPLS over 500,000 when their skyline was built"

Sorry buddy, but much of MPLS' skyline has gone up after 1990, When population #s are similar to now.

So... yeah.. back to my point... still a pretty impressive skyline for a city of less than 400,000 people
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,693 posts, read 9,939,641 times
Reputation: 3448
Quote:
Originally Posted by knke0204 View Post
Hey, I'm not the one who said that Dallas' skyline was built when their population was way higher.

You said "Well yeah, but their population in MPLS over 500,000 when their skyline was built"

Sorry buddy, but much of MPLS' skyline has gone up after 1990, When population #s are similar to now.

So... yeah.. back to my point... still a pretty impressive skyline for a city of less than 400,000 people
I didn't say that.

We started to build our skyline in the 50s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2010, 01:32 PM
 
Location: MN
3,971 posts, read 9,674,523 times
Reputation: 2148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallaz View Post
When they started to build their skyline, the city wasn't that small. The biggest population was 521,718.
^ ok?

Even though the skyline MPLS has now was pretty much built from 1990 - now. and the population has never gone over 390,000 people in that time frame.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top