Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-22-2012, 09:54 PM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,972,699 times
Reputation: 5813

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
The only ones I can think of off the top of my head are Phoenix, OKC, Tulsa, Omaha, Salt Lake City, Jacksonville FL, and Orange County CA. Harris County TX (Houston) barely voted for Obama and sometimes goes red.

Conservative cities also tend to be less walkable which makes a huge difference on forums such as this where most people prefer walkable cities and would prefer not to even have to own a car. It's next to impossible to make it in the cities mentioned above without owning an automobile. Even if you live in a walkable neighborhood, you'll still need a car because that neighborhood isn't going to have everything you are ever going to need to do and public transportation is hit or miss. If you are a hipster, that is no bueno.
Salt Lake City's metro doesn't break 1 million, and Salt Lake City itself doesn't break 200,000, it's relatively small actually.

Tulsa's metro population doesn't break a million either, but the city itself is right at 400,000, still not that big.

Jacksonville is a pretty split city, from what I know of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-23-2012, 04:22 AM
 
Location: The Magnolia City
8,928 posts, read 14,338,208 times
Reputation: 4853
Quote:
Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
The only ones I can think of off the top of my head are Phoenix, OKC, Tulsa, Omaha, Salt Lake City, Jacksonville FL, and Orange County CA. Harris County TX (Houston) barely voted for Obama and sometimes goes red.

Conservative cities also tend to be less walkable which makes a huge difference on forums such as this where most people prefer walkable cities and would prefer not to even have to own a car. It's next to impossible to make it in the cities mentioned above without owning an automobile. Even if you live in a walkable neighborhood, you'll still need a car because that neighborhood isn't going to have everything you are ever going to need to do and public transportation is hit or miss. If you are a hipster, that is no bueno.
The Houston metro does not belong in that group. Harris County is mostly suburban, and less than half of it is made up of TCOH. The county hasn't gone red in years and most likely never will again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2012, 05:14 PM
 
Location: Spring Hill FL
552 posts, read 720,314 times
Reputation: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by polo89 View Post
Is it so wrong to be treated like the 1st class citizen every now and then?
Are you implying minorities are treated like 2nd class citizens? Because I dont see it. Matter of fact if I did see a minority being treated as such I would bet all my savings that there would be 100 white people right behind shouting RACIST. Cant imagine it going the other way though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2012, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Spring Hill FL
552 posts, read 720,314 times
Reputation: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdAilment View Post
That one kind of surprises me. Indiana is in the midwest, why the big presence there?
Apparently only southerners are racist in this persons mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2012, 08:09 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,513,296 times
Reputation: 5884
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdAilment View Post
So what is an example of a major city that does not have urban sprawl?
There is a difference between urban sprawl, and urban sprawl within say, a 50-100 mile square core...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2012, 09:02 PM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,972,699 times
Reputation: 5813
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHborn View Post
Apparently only southerners are racist in this persons mind.
You clearly missed the point, and I won't bother highlighting it for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 12:06 AM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,118,572 times
Reputation: 4794
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdAilment View Post
Salt Lake City's metro doesn't break 1 million, and Salt Lake City itself doesn't break 200,000, it's relatively small actually.

Tulsa's metro population doesn't break a million either, but the city itself is right at 400,000, still not that big.

Jacksonville is a pretty split city, from what I know of it.

You need to check your numbers....

Salt Lake City 2009 population of 1,141,693, an increase of 172,835 or 17.8 percent since April 2000.[2] The Salt Lake City Metropolitan Area and the Ogden-Clearfield Metropolitan Area were a single metropolitan area known as the Salt Lake City-Ogden Metropolitan Area until being separated in 2005.[3]
Salt Lake City/Ogden CSA - population at 1,743,364 as of July 1, 2009
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 08:22 AM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,972,699 times
Reputation: 5813
Quote:
Originally Posted by slo1318 View Post
You need to check your numbers....

Salt Lake City 2009 population of 1,141,693, an increase of 172,835 or 17.8 percent since April 2000.[2] The Salt Lake City Metropolitan Area and the Ogden-Clearfield Metropolitan Area were a single metropolitan area known as the Salt Lake City-Ogden Metropolitan Area until being separated in 2005.[3]
Salt Lake City/Ogden CSA - population at 1,743,364 as of July 1, 2009
Looks like I was wrong On Salt Lake City, I was using the 2000 information.

But Tulsa has not yet cracked 1 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 08:35 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,934,015 times
Reputation: 8365
I don't know if I posted already in this thread, but my preference is for dense older cities on or near a coast. The biggest exception would be Chicago, but Lake Michigan more than makes up for that.

So of the 25 Largest Metros, I would never want to live in:

1. Phoenix, AZ
2. Indianapolis, IN
3. Dallas, TX
4. Orlando, FL
5. Columbus, OH

It wouldn't kill me to live in any other of the top 25 Metros except maybe Detroit, Sacremento, Kansas City and San Antonio.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Spring Hill FL
552 posts, read 720,314 times
Reputation: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdAilment View Post
You clearly missed the point, and I won't bother highlighting it for you.
Is is surprising to you because you think the midwest doesnt have alot of black people? Well it does. Almost 600,000 in Indiana. Millions more in Illinois, Michigan, Ohio.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top