Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-16-2011, 02:13 PM
 
Location: Tower of Heaven
4,023 posts, read 7,376,614 times
Reputation: 1450

Advertisements

Here :
Foreign Trade: Data

1.Texas ($163 billions)
2.California ($120B)
3.New York ($59B)
4.Washington ($52B)
5.Florida ($47B)

What do you think about it ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-16-2011, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,060,443 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by RenaudFR View Post
What do you think about it ?
That Panamax 2014 will really set the sails for Texas & Florida to become larger gainers. Extend the Panama Canal! We're all going to benefit from it though as long as the United States keeps its exports higher than its imports (Economical surplus) or exports and imports at the same rate as each other (Economical balance).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2011, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,970,870 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by RenaudFR View Post
Here :
Foreign Trade: Data

1.Texas ($163 billions)
2.California ($120B)
3.New York ($59B)
4.Washington ($52B)
5.Florida ($47B)

What do you think about it ?

Good show Texas
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2011, 02:24 PM
 
12,735 posts, read 21,792,548 times
Reputation: 3774
So the Panama Canal extension will bring way more growth to Houston?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2011, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Spain
1,854 posts, read 4,924,648 times
Reputation: 973
Wow those are very impressive numbers for Washington! I wonder how much of that is due to the ports along the puget sound.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2011, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,060,443 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M Bulldawg View Post
So the Panama Canal extension will bring way more growth to Houston?
An Excerpt (Article) The Article came out 4 days ago, hundreds of other articles in the last 5 years similar to it:
Quote:
GALVESTON — The ports of Houston and Galveston are exploring the construction of a huge new container terminal on Pelican Island to take advantage of an expected explosion in container traffic after the widening of the Panama Canal is completed, but they may get an unexpected partner.
Source: Galveston wants say on Pelican Island terminal | Houston & Texas News | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M Bulldawg View Post
So the Panama Canal extension will bring way more growth to Houston?
Yes. Not way more, but an explosive hell yes, never been seen before (in this region of the country at least), completely unmatched WAYYYY MORE!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2011, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Tower of Heaven
4,023 posts, read 7,376,614 times
Reputation: 1450
Quote:
Originally Posted by DANNYY View Post
That Panamax 2014 will really set the sails for Texas & Florida to become larger gainers. Extend the Panama Canal! We're all going to benefit from it though as long as the United States keeps its exports higher than its imports (Economical surplus) or exports and imports at the same rate as each other (Economical balance).
Yes, Panamax 2014 is real opportunity for Texas and Florida (Louisiana too, this state needs it), they can be happy.Texas domination will be stronger and Florida could become third.
California was first prior to 2003 but now second, but it's still good..The problem : the state doesn't invest in its ports, they're old and crowded..Texas extended its ports and modernize them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2011, 02:37 PM
 
12,735 posts, read 21,792,548 times
Reputation: 3774
Quote:
Originally Posted by DANNYY View Post
An Excerpt (Article) The Article came out 4 days ago, hundreds of other articles in the last 5 years similar to it:

Source: Galveston wants say on Pelican Island terminal | Houston & Texas News | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle

Yes. Not way more, but an explosive hell yes, never been seen before (in this region of the country at least), completely unmatched WAYYYY MORE!
DANG, Houston! Y'all need to need to invest into some benefical and effective public transportation quickly before the area starts growing almost 200,000 people annually! LOL!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2011, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,231,263 times
Reputation: 7428
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&M Bulldawg View Post
DANG, Houston! Y'all need to need to invest into some benefical and effective public transportation quickly before the area starts growing almost 200,000 people annually! LOL!
It's already happening!

I'd prefer a different method of approach to expanding metro rail, but.....it's some what feasible for the inner loop. I just got this cheap camera, but it's good enough to where I can get around and show some pictures of the construction happening around 3rd Ward with rail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2011, 02:58 PM
 
3,711 posts, read 5,991,928 times
Reputation: 3044
New Panamax is going to lead to larger and larger ships using the Canal, which will probably help the bigger ports and hurt the smaller ones. Some ports will be unable to pay to dredge out the water for the deeper drafts. Also, it's more expensive for larger ships to call on each port, so there will likely be some consolidation in ship calls and a degradation in service at smaller ports.

Ports that have carved out a niche--like the Port of Brunswick, GA an roll-on roll-off traffic, or the Port of Mobile in bulks--will probably be unaffected.

It's unlikely any regional shifts will be that drastic--for instance, containers bound for Pittsburgh will not suddenly go through Texas--save for one: California's huge business of "land bridging" containers bound for the East Coast by train will probably be threatened. So I think most of the major east coast ports will be the ones that will benefit from the canal expansion. And the economy in general, of course.

The real loser in all this is Nicaragua. Now they'll never get a canal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top