Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: McMansions or Townhomes/Brownstones
McMansions 27 23.08%
Townhomes/Brownstones 90 76.92%
Voters: 117. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-11-2019, 12:26 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
700 posts, read 421,563 times
Reputation: 491

Advertisements

Why are people saying Townhomes and Bronwstones have no yard space? This is false and not true. I remember working for an advertisement company two months back and our window was located between two blocks in Greenwich Village and I vividly remembered the whole middle of the block lined up with functioning yard space and even rooftop settings (which you can’t do in a McMansion).

I love a neighborhood feel so I pick townhomes and Brownstones.

If your townhome or rowhome has thin walls and mice, perhaps you’re rowhome is old and not updated or you live in a ghetto.

With that being said you have some nice big homes in ghetto Detroit that look like they’re in horrible condition and I’m not talking about the abandoned ones either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-11-2019, 12:28 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
700 posts, read 421,563 times
Reputation: 491
^^^ I also hate the work required to maintain a McMansion. Front yard, back yard and the god damn roof? No way I rather play Red Dead Redemption 2 for Xbox on my weekends.

Pretty good at that game too. Can’t be distracted!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 04:39 AM
 
Location: Norteh Bajo Americano
1,631 posts, read 2,385,526 times
Reputation: 2116
In Los Angeles, we dont have brownstone/rowhomes/terraced homes like other cities.
LA has normal mansions like in Bel Air and Beverly Hills, but lately lots of Mcmansions are popping up. Though the term just means they tear down an older smaller California bungalow style home that is maybe 1000-1500 sf on a 1/5 of an acre and build a 3000 square foot 2 story home that is pretty much all house and little yard. Here are some examples on google street view.
Beverly Grove: https://goo.gl/maps/ugg9DXUekkt3px398
Venice: https://goo.gl/maps/cAeeyWQnQndM4ucW9
Palms: https://goo.gl/maps/yThcY2W6rWUki1k87
Cheviot Hills: https://goo.gl/maps/RwY5HCy2JT63AqN16
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 10:20 AM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,338,961 times
Reputation: 6225
Quote:
Originally Posted by iLoveFashion View Post
Why are people saying Townhomes and Bronwstones have no yard space? This is false and not true. I remember working for an advertisement company two months back and our window was located between two blocks in Greenwich Village and I vividly remembered the whole middle of the block lined up with functioning yard space and even rooftop settings (which you can’t do in a McMansion).

I love a neighborhood feel so I pick townhomes and Brownstones.

If your townhome or rowhome has thin walls and mice, perhaps you’re rowhome is old and not updated or you live in a ghetto.

With that being said you have some nice big homes in ghetto Detroit that look like they’re in horrible condition and I’m not talking about the abandoned ones either.
Because people pretend to know what they're talking about without actually ever having been in a rowhome/brownstone neighborhood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 12:27 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
3,416 posts, read 2,454,235 times
Reputation: 6166
Quote:
Originally Posted by saybanana View Post
In Los Angeles, we dont have brownstone/rowhomes/terraced homes like other cities.
LA has normal mansions like in Bel Air and Beverly Hills, but lately lots of Mcmansions are popping up. Though the term just means they tear down an older smaller California bungalow style home that is maybe 1000-1500 sf on a 1/5 of an acre and build a 3000 square foot 2 story home that is pretty much all house and little yard. Here are some examples on google street view.
Beverly Grove: https://goo.gl/maps/ugg9DXUekkt3px398
Venice: https://goo.gl/maps/cAeeyWQnQndM4ucW9
Palms: https://goo.gl/maps/yThcY2W6rWUki1k87
Cheviot Hills: https://goo.gl/maps/RwY5HCy2JT63AqN16
Such a shame. My wife and I were just there this last weekend and one of our favorite things to do is to meander through different neighborhoods admiring all the cool old houses. I may be way off, but it seems like there has been more of an effort lately to restore rather than tear down from what I see the handful of times I’m there a year. Maybe I’m just seeing what I want to?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 02:34 PM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,338,961 times
Reputation: 6225
Quote:
Originally Posted by TacoSoup View Post
Such a shame. My wife and I were just there this last weekend and one of our favorite things to do is to meander through different neighborhoods admiring all the cool old houses. I may be way off, but it seems like there has been more of an effort lately to restore rather than tear down from what I see the handful of times I’m there a year. Maybe I’m just seeing what I want to?
I do think LA has finally for once in its existence realized the value of preserving older buildings. There has been a lot of pressure to ban tearing down older buildings and replacing them with McMansions. The Spanish style homes in places like Mid Wilshire are absolutely beautiful and it makes me both sad and angry seeing them replaced with glass and concrete boxes. There so many places you could build such an ugly home, why bother tearing down a beautiful older home to do that?

I absolutely love these styles:
https://goo.gl/maps/YGMDquT9G4rsCBfA6
https://goo.gl/maps/4f747AzrdGNYS5167
https://goo.gl/maps/GhFRxW3FRz2SqtrZA
https://goo.gl/maps/NwFtGutG3Mp2xpU37

However, I think the damage has been done pretty hard already though. On the same blocks as those street views, you can often see quite a few McMansions that are far too large for their lot sizes towering over the beautiful original Spanish style homes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 02:38 PM
 
6,222 posts, read 3,595,519 times
Reputation: 5055
Quote:
Originally Posted by iLoveFashion View Post
Why are people saying Townhomes and Bronwstones have no yard space? This is false and not true. I remember working for an advertisement company two months back and our window was located between two blocks in Greenwich Village and I vividly remembered the whole middle of the block lined up with functioning yard space and even rooftop settings (which you can’t do in a McMansion).

I love a neighborhood feel so I pick townhomes and Brownstones.

If your townhome or rowhome has thin walls and mice, perhaps you’re rowhome is old and not updated or you live in a ghetto.

With that being said you have some nice big homes in ghetto Detroit that look like they’re in horrible condition and I’m not talking about the abandoned ones either.
They should look at an aerial view of these neighborhoods and see for themselves.

The 3-8 family buildings in North Brooklyn/Ridgewood also tend to have backyards
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 10:23 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn, NY
700 posts, read 421,563 times
Reputation: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foamposite View Post
They should look at an aerial view of these neighborhoods and see for themselves.

The 3-8 family buildings in North Brooklyn/Ridgewood also tend to have backyards
I’ll go even further and say in some neighborhoods townhomes have long yard space.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2019, 01:18 PM
 
Location: PNW
676 posts, read 647,413 times
Reputation: 767
Well if I had everything I wanted materially in life, a McMansion... in a very wealthy, upper-crust part of the city, not far from the CBD, gated entry with a valet, butler, gardener and garage space for four vehicles and world class furnishings, entertainment systems and a wine cellar that can store 5000 bottles (and already stocked for me by my own personal sommelier). Yeah, that'd be nice.

But if all I could afford was the ****ty suburban 5000 sq ft behemoth that has no neighborhood and the lifestyle of the community is to shop at Costco, mow the lawns, paint the house and upkeep the damn place on their own and no one from the city would bother venturing to or even mentioning unless they have a family member they have to visit there? Hell no. I'll gladly take a nicely appointed townhome with a small patio and garden, with a strata to share the upkeep and take care of things and located near the urban core on a vibrant walkable community with transit and services nearby any damn day of the year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2019, 11:21 PM
 
23,688 posts, read 9,373,010 times
Reputation: 8652
McMansion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top