Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-30-2015, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
4,529 posts, read 4,054,974 times
Reputation: 3100

Advertisements

What would you think are the top 3 urban cities to raise family in? By urban I mean rowhome level density minimum and no car technically needed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-30-2015, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Independent Republic of Ballard
8,075 posts, read 8,381,653 times
Reputation: 6238
Population minimum? Comparing a 50,000 pop. city to 500,000 city is apples and oranges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 12:00 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,356,572 times
Reputation: 10644
NYC is the only U.S. city where families aren't likely to be owning a car. Every other U.S. city has like 70%+ car ownership, and much higher still for non-poor families.

So using your criteria, NYC is the only answer. Using a more general criteria of "which urban locations are best for families if money weren't a factor", maybe NYC, SF, Boston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 12:13 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
4,529 posts, read 4,054,974 times
Reputation: 3100
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyDonkey View Post
Population minimum? Comparing a 50,000 pop. city to 500,000 city is apples and oranges.
Is there even a 50k urban city in america? It'd virtually have to be rowhomes cutting off straight into wilderness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 12:19 PM
 
1,461 posts, read 2,113,706 times
Reputation: 1036
There are some relatively speaking urban suburbs of around 50k pop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
4,529 posts, read 4,054,974 times
Reputation: 3100
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
NYC is the only U.S. city where families aren't likely to be owning a car. Every other U.S. city has like 70%+ car ownership, and much higher still for non-poor families.

So using your criteria, NYC is the only answer. Using a more general criteria of "which urban locations are best for families if money weren't a factor", maybe NYC, SF, Boston.
I guess those three would be the best if you had infinite money, but would be the best considering COL and potentially not sending your kids to private school. Not saying that rules them out, but SF and Boston are known for being bleach clean gentrified with the COL to go with it in their actual urban city limits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
4,529 posts, read 4,054,974 times
Reputation: 3100
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadicalAtheist View Post
There are some relatively speaking urban suburbs of around 50k pop.
A suburb can't hit rowhome level density though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 12:51 PM
 
1,461 posts, read 2,113,706 times
Reputation: 1036
Maybe not, are rowhomes significant to you for some reason? They aren't always required in an urban setting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 12:58 PM
 
93,559 posts, read 124,263,512 times
Reputation: 18278
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNigh View Post
Is there even a 50k urban city in america? It'd virtually have to be rowhomes cutting off straight into wilderness.
Yes.....Look into Cohoes, Watervliet, Rensselaer and Green Island in the Albany-Schenectady-Troy NY metro. You can find rowhouses/dense housing in those smaller communities.

Upstate NY's most dense municipality is actually Kenmore, a suburban village adjacent to Buffalo's North Side(1.4 square miles with about 15,000 people). It is in the top 100 in the country in regards to population density.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2015, 02:03 PM
 
1,039 posts, read 1,103,745 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadicalAtheist View Post
Maybe not, are rowhomes significant to you for some reason? They aren't always required in an urban setting.
He is from Philly...I agree that there is no specific reason why it has to be rowhouses
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top