Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-02-2012, 05:50 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,482,823 times
Reputation: 21229

Advertisements

++1



2011 Total Personal Income Growth Rate
1 North Dakota +8.1%
2 Iowa +6.8%
3 Texas +6.6%
4 Oklahoma +6.2%
5 South Dakota +6.2%
6 Nebraska +6.2%
7 Wyoming +5.9%
8 Colorado +5.7%
9 California +5.6%
Washington DC +5.6%
10 Utah +5.5%

11 Idaho +5.4%
12 Tennessee +5.4%
13 Washington +5.3%
14 Oregon +5.3%
15 Michigan +5.2%
16 Illinois +5.2%
17 Wisconsin +5.2%
18 Montana +5.1%
19 Minnesota +5.1%
20 Indiana +5.0%

21 Connecticut +5.0%
22 Massachusetts +5.0%
23 Georgia +5.0%
24 Arzona +5.0%
25 New Hampshire +4.9%
26 Maryland +4.9%
27 Louisiana +4.8%
28 Pennsylvania +4.8%
29 Florida +4.7%
30 Kentucky +4.7%

31 Delaware +4.7%
32 South Carolina +4.7%
33 Virginia +4.7%
34 West Virginia +4.6%
35 Rhode Island +4.6%
36 Ohio +4.6%
37 New Mexico +4.5%
38 Hawaii +4.5%
39 New York +4.4%
40 North Carolina +4.3%

41 Vermont +4.3%
42 Kansas +4.3%
43 Arkansas +4.3%
44 New Jersey +4.4%
46 Alaska +4.2%
47 Nevada +4.1%
48 Mississippi +3.8%
49 Alabama +3.8%
50 Maine +3.4%

http://bea.gov/newsreleases/regional...df/spi0312.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-02-2012, 09:30 AM
 
3,708 posts, read 5,983,256 times
Reputation: 3036
It's worth looking at the per capita data, as well. The data shown in OP is the aggregate, so population growth is affects it as well.

That bodes ill for the south: most southern states were middling at best in the total income growth despite fast population growth. Florida, North Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, and Arkansas would all be bottom fifth, and Georgia, South Carolina, and Virginia would be next-to-bottom, using a per capita measure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2012, 11:00 AM
205
 
518 posts, read 448,479 times
Reputation: 720
Quote:
Originally Posted by testa50 View Post
It's worth looking at the per capita data, as well. The data shown in OP is the aggregate, so population growth is affects it as well.

That bodes ill for the south: most southern states were middling at best in the total income growth despite fast population growth. Florida, North Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, and Arkansas would all be bottom fifth, and Georgia, South Carolina, and Virginia would be next-to-bottom, using a per capita measure.

It's also worth noting that year to year snap shots can be a bit deceiving coming out of this massive recession. The negative effects of the recession that started in 2008 started affecting different states at different times so some states are further along in their recovery than others. This is a one year snapshot too so it can be skewed kinda like a similar study that rated metro area income growth that ranked New Orleans #1 in income growth due heavily to simply rapidly recovering back to normal after Katrina. I'm not trying to pick on New Orleans but they were dead last in 25 year income growth in a study that looked at income growth from 1980-2005 so 1 year snapshots can be tricky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2012, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Syracuse, New York
3,121 posts, read 3,094,521 times
Reputation: 2312
Maine's woes are probably the result of an aging population and brain drain. Whatever Mississippi and Alabama are doing ain't working.

Iowa's second places showing is a shocker. I had no idea that their economy ramped up.

Good to see Michigan making a comeback.

Could the South's per capita problems be the result of down and out folks from outside the region relocating there as their most viable option? When you're close to flat busted, you're not going to relocate to a high cost state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top