Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-17-2012, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
635 posts, read 1,543,066 times
Reputation: 245

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NowInWI View Post
25 Cities Ranked In Order Of Importance - Business Insider

There are definitely dreamers on this forum. This lays it all out. I know it will be argued and ignored by some (who will think they know better). I tend to rely on those who don't have a bias, and information that's in black and white.
Well it's Washington and then Houston. Question answered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-17-2012, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh (via Chicago, via Pittsburgh)
3,887 posts, read 5,530,290 times
Reputation: 3107
Washington or SF... I'm sorry I just can't get on the Houston wagon here. I understand that it has economic prominence, but SF and DC are EASILY better contenders. Houston just doesn't do it for me with it's 634 square mile land area and not incredibly diverse economic stature. Houston needs to diversify, become more dense, develop better transit and a few other things before I put it with NYC, LA, Chi, DC and SF. Give me all the business re-location jargon and yearly stats you want... Imagine if Chicago expanded its limits to 634 square miles...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 11:03 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,701 posts, read 14,720,226 times
Reputation: 3668
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForYourLungsOnly View Post
Washington or SF... I'm sorry I just can't get on the Houston wagon here. I understand that it has economic prominence, but SF and DC are EASILY better contenders. Houston just doesn't do it for me with it's 634 square mile land area and not incredibly diverse economic stature. Houston needs to diversify, become more dense, develop better transit and a few other things before I put it with NYC, LA, Chi, DC and SF. Give me all the business re-location jargon and yearly stats you want... Imagine if Chicago expanded its limits to 634 square miles...
Or any city for that matter. Philly would have a population of like 8 million if it's city limits were that far stretched and it would still be denser (development wise) than Houston. 80% of Philly's suburbs are denser than 80% of the city of Houston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 11:23 AM
 
1,588 posts, read 4,067,570 times
Reputation: 900
This is easy - Washington D.C.

What's with the people suggesting Atlanta?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Not where I want to be
80 posts, read 146,269 times
Reputation: 59
Washington DC
Bay Area

Boston
Houston
Dallas

Miami/Atlanta
Philadelphia

Detroit/Seattle
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 02:11 PM
 
1,348 posts, read 2,861,989 times
Reputation: 1247
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClarenceBodiker View Post
1. San Francisco
2a. Houston
2b. Washington, DC
I think SF Bay Area, in terms of its population, economy and cosmopolitanism should be in the First Tier.

Next would be DC. But the strange thing about DC though is that it definitely doesn't feel like a big city nor does it feel like it has 8 million plus people in the surrounding area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 02:25 PM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,663 posts, read 28,756,270 times
Reputation: 25251
Quote:
Originally Posted by sacramento916 View Post
Next would be DC. But the strange thing about DC though is that it definitely doesn't feel like a big city nor does it feel like it has 8 million plus people in the surrounding area.
The facts are kind of strange though. Hahaha.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-17-2012, 02:55 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
37 posts, read 79,448 times
Reputation: 51
No brainer. Washington DC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2012, 05:07 PM
 
4,692 posts, read 9,316,926 times
Reputation: 1335
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForYourLungsOnly View Post
Washington or SF... I'm sorry I just can't get on the Houston wagon here. I understand that it has economic prominence, but SF and DC are EASILY better contenders. Houston just doesn't do it for me with it's 634 square mile land area and not incredibly diverse economic stature. Houston needs to diversify, become more dense, develop better transit and a few other things before I put it with NYC, LA, Chi, DC and SF. Give me all the business re-location jargon and yearly stats you want... Imagine if Chicago expanded its limits to 634 square miles...
While I will not say you're wrong in your opinion just a few things to point out. The 634 square miles of Houston's land area is pretty much a non-factor in many of the rankings that you see on here i.e. GaWC, BEA, etc. The MSA is the metrithat is used here. This is the metric that is used for all metros nationwide so the same criteria used got Houston id used got NYC. That being said DC with the same metric has a higher GDP. Also, even though Houston has a higher GDP than SF, when you fair in the bay area it's GDP is larger. This id why while GDP is a good factor it is not the determining factor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2012, 06:38 PM
 
10,117 posts, read 10,004,454 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by sacramento916 View Post
I think SF Bay Area, in terms of its population, economy and cosmopolitanism should be in the First Tier.

Next would be DC. But the strange thing about DC though is that it definitely doesn't feel like a big city nor does it feel like it has 8 million plus people in the surrounding area.
That's the same thing I said about Baltimore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top