Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seattle probably deserved it's own option considering some of the other options. But I think that's a city people tend to value typically for natural aesthetics. Speaking of which it's a total joke that LA is winning a contest for urban beauty. At least the poll is made public and we know it's the same usual fanboys being biased and voting for their favorite cities.
Are voters insane? LA has lovely natural landscape, but the majority of the city is downright ugly with its urban landscape. That is, unless you think miles upon miles of auto shops and barb wire over chain link fences is appealing.
Some of their Art Deco, Contemporary, Experimental, Stucco, and even Modernist architecture looked fairly beautiful to me.
Could you give a link to an example?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.