Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Damn, that could've saved me a whole lot of time. I used the 1 year estimates instead of the three year estimates though, hence some of the number discrepancy.
From the map, I notice that Westerners really don't migrate much out of the West. Wonder why that is.
In terms of % of the population born within the state, I noticed that no Western state has more than 55% of its population born in its state. Utah is the highest at 61.9%.
Conversely, the Midwestern state with the lowest "born in state' population is Kansas at 58.8%
Next to California, Colorado and Texas has the next best balance of transplants
California: 6,702,288, of which
1,496,860 Northeast (23.3)
2,050,352 Midwest (30.6)
1,802,832 South (26.9)
1,352,944 West (20.2)
Colorado: 2,352,735, of which
327,463 Northeast (13.9)
861,866 Midwest (36.6)
503,458 South (21.4)
659,928 West (28.0)
Texas: 5,553,655, of which
695,750 Northeast (12.5)
1,511,610 Midwest (27.2)
2,054,470 South (37.0)
1,292,355 West (23.2)
Most of the Northeast metro areas seem to have that same pattern: lots of people from other northeastern states, not so much from the rest of the country. If I had to take a guess, all 3 metro areas have lots of people from neighboring states who move within the metro but move between states, counting them as transplants.
Yes, but Philly and NYC had decent amounts of immigration from the South. In Boston's case, extremely few people moved there from other parts of the country whereas millions moved there from other northeastern states.
It looks like Boston has the most disproportionate data of the cities on this list.
Yes, but Philly and NYC had decent amounts of immigration from the South. In Boston's case, extremely few people moved there from other parts of the country whereas millions moved there from other northeastern states.
How recent is it? I suspect many if not most of those are older blacks that arrived in the Great Migration. The Boston CSA has a much lower black population in both absolute and % numbers, so that would explain the difference. If Boston migrants are mostly from other New England states, it show up as a having more transplants even if they are from really the same region (in contrast to San Francicso, where all of California count as non-transplants).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.