Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city do you prefer?
Newark, NJ 2 4.55%
Long Beach, CA 6 13.64%
Aurora, CO 1 2.27%
St. Petersburg, FL 4 9.09%
Fort Worth, TX 9 20.45%
Tacoma, WA 2 4.55%
St. Paul, MN 11 25.00%
Oakland, CA 9 20.45%
Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-03-2014, 12:35 PM
 
1,512 posts, read 2,364,817 times
Reputation: 1285

Advertisements

Which of the following cities do you prefer in terms of economy, people, scenery, architecture, culture, weather, things to do, amenities, transportation, etc.

Newark, NJ
Long Beach, CA
Aurora, CO
St. Petersburg, FL
Fort Worth, TX
Tacoma, WA
St. Paul, MN
Oakland, CA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2014, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Phoenix Arizona
2,032 posts, read 4,892,835 times
Reputation: 2751
Shouldn't it be Boulder, CO?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 12:56 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,704,020 times
Reputation: 5872
Voted for Aurora (Because I live here )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
10,646 posts, read 16,032,303 times
Reputation: 5286
Why are these not in the poll?

Mesa, Arizona
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Norfolk, Virginia
Durham, North Carolina
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 02:29 PM
 
1,461 posts, read 2,110,925 times
Reputation: 1036
Surprisingly Oakland is the most appealing to me from the list. Which is especially weird because I love the time I have spent in FW.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,747,031 times
Reputation: 10592
Of the ones listed, I would prefer Long Beach, Fort Worth, and Oakland in that order. If Fort Lauderdale was an option, it would go between Fort Worth and Oakland.

I like Oakland, but the only part of the Bay Area I really feel at home in is San Jose. San Francisco is nice for a visit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,405,419 times
Reputation: 5368
Are St. Paul and Ft. Worth really satellite cities?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 03:21 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
1,912 posts, read 2,091,677 times
Reputation: 4048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maintainschaos View Post
Are St. Paul and Ft. Worth really satellite cities?
No, they're not. A satellite city refers to a smaller metropolitan area which is located somewhat near to, but is mostly independent of a larger metropolitan area.

According to Wikipedia, these are the characteristics that a satellite city has:
  • predate the metropolis' suburban expansion
  • are at least partially independent from that metropolis economically and socially
  • are physically separated from the metropolis by rural territory or by a major geographic barrier such as a large river; satellite cities should have their own independent urbanized area, or equivalent
  • have their own bedroom communities
  • have a traditional downtown surrounded by traditional "inner city" neighborhoods
  • may or may not be counted as part of the large metropolis' Combined Statistical Area

A good example for the Twin Cities would be Saint Cloud, Minnesota.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,747,031 times
Reputation: 10592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maintainschaos View Post
Are St. Paul and Ft. Worth really satellite cities?
They arent. Since they were included though, I voted on them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2014, 04:24 PM
 
Location: Portland, OR -> Rocky River, OH
869 posts, read 1,278,311 times
Reputation: 652
Tacoma, WA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top