Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-06-2015, 07:19 PM
 
Location: Atlanta ,GA
9,067 posts, read 15,803,733 times
Reputation: 2980

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holy Roman Emperor View Post
Because many of the executives don't even live in Atlanta.

For example, CNN. The CEO, executives and the top anchors have all fled Atlanta and moved to New York in the past few years, but the official headquarters still remains Atlanta (for now), for costs savings I presume.

CNN talent drains as anchors and executives desert Atlanta for New York City

Sometimes CEOs move corporations just because they want to live somewhere (i.e. Anheuser Busch and Cadillac recently moved to Manhattan just because their CEOs wanted to live there), but it doesn't make much sense imo. Once you're an executive, it's easy to leave the corporation in a low-tax place and just commute from where you really want to live to headquarters w/ jet.
Not true.CNN is not a good example because although it was founded and headquartered in Atlanta,it is now owned by Time Warner for the last 15 years at least.
Those executives are a part of a larger company headquartered in NYC.

Most executives DO live in Atlanta.Its not even a question.
Just drive around and hang out in Buckhead and Alpharetta and you will easily see what i mean.
They live like kings.Nicer weather less personal income taxes and great air connectivity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-06-2015, 07:40 PM
 
Location: London and New York
26 posts, read 38,432 times
Reputation: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by afonega1 View Post
Not true.CNN is not a good example because although it was founded and headquartered in Atlanta,it is now owned by Time Warner for the last 15 years at least.
Those executives are a part of a larger company headquartered in NYC.

Most executives DO live in Atlanta.Its not even a question.
Just drive around and hang out in Buckhead and Alpharetta and you will easily see what i mean.
They live like kings.Nicer weather less personal income taxes and great air connectivity.
What do you mean it's not true? The big CNN anchors are no longer in Atlanta. The CEO is no longer in Atlanta. They moved to New York. I'm sure Buckhead is nice for its location, but it can't be compared to New York as real-estate values show. The number of high-flying executives who would chose to live in Atlanta over New York, the world's capital of executives, is minuscule.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2015, 11:24 PM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,140,627 times
Reputation: 6338
Atlanta has always been an odd location for CNN anyway. Almost all of the main media corporations are located in NYC. It is the media capital of the world so it's not surprising they moved most of their main anchors to NYC to be closer to the center of the industry.

The cheaper taxes and pro-business environment is probably what's keeping their headquarters in Atlanta even though it's almost in name only. Also, Ted Turner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2015, 01:21 AM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,937,691 times
Reputation: 7420
Here's a listing of the Fortune 1000 by MSA:

New York - 123
Chicago - 61
Houston - 56
Dallas - 41
Los Angeles - 35
San Jose - 31
Atlanta - 30
Washington DC - 29
San Francisco - 27
Philadelphia - 26
Boston - 24
Denver - 23
Minneapolis - 23
St. Louis - 19
Detroit - 18
Bridgeport, CT - 16
Charlotte - 16
Phoenix - 16
Columbus, OH - 15
Seattle - 15
Cincinnati - 14
Cleveland - 14
Miami - 13
Milwaukee - 13
Pittsburgh - 13
Nashville - 10
Omaha - 10
Richmond, VA - 10
Indianapolis - 9
Kansas City - 9
Las Vegas - 8
Tulsa - 8
Baltimore - 7
Providence - 7
Tampa - 7
Harrisburg, PA - 6
Oklahoma City - 6
Portland - 6
San Antonio - 6
Birmingham - 5
Hartford, CT - 5
Memphis - 5
Toledo - 5
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2015, 02:57 AM
 
Location: Atlanta ,GA
9,067 posts, read 15,803,733 times
Reputation: 2980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holy Roman Emperor View Post
What do you mean it's not true? The big CNN anchors are no longer in Atlanta. The CEO is no longer in Atlanta. They moved to New York. I'm sure Buckhead is nice for its location, but it can't be compared to New York as real-estate values show. The number of high-flying executives who would chose to live in Atlanta over New York, the world's capital of executives, is minuscule.
The CEO of CNN lived in NYC from the beginning,Jeff Zucker.All previous ones lived in Atlanta.
I was not comparing it to NYC but these companies are based and founded in Atlanta.Most did not move here and those who did are fully in Atlanta including the majority of the executives.

Quote:
Atlanta-based CNN Worldwide will be veering back toward its journalistic roots with the naming of Jeff Zucker, the former president of NBCUniversal, as its new president.

But one major difference is that for the first time ever the president of CNN will not be based in Atlanta.
CNN is owned by Time Warner now,It is based in NYC.
They have no need to live in NYC unless they want to.

Im saying you are wrong if you think these companies are keeping there top executives hundreds of miles away from the companys main headquarters UNLESS they are wholly owned by someone else in another city like CNN.

Last edited by afonega1; 06-07-2015 at 03:11 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2015, 03:01 AM
 
Location: Atlanta ,GA
9,067 posts, read 15,803,733 times
Reputation: 2980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Atlanta has always been an odd location for CNN anyway. Almost all of the main media corporations are located in NYC. It is the media capital of the world so it's not surprising they moved most of their main anchors to NYC to be closer to the center of the industry.

The cheaper taxes and pro-business environment is probably what's keeping their headquarters in Atlanta even though it's almost in name only. Also, Ted Turner.
Since it ws founded in Atlanta CNN has flourished,It only started waning when Time Warner bought them So Im not a believer that it is a necessity more than a want by the top executive to move it,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2015, 09:26 AM
 
4,344 posts, read 2,813,808 times
Reputation: 5273
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Here's a look at the cities with the most Fortune 1000 companies based there. Not MSA, but city only:

1. New York, NY - 71
2. Houston, TX - 48
3. Atlanta, GA - 23
4. Chicago, IL - 22
5. St. Louis, MO - 15

And here are the top states for Fortune 1000:
1. Texas - 107
2. California - 101
3. New York - 98
4. Illinois - 63
5. Ohio - 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Here's a listing of the Fortune 1000 by MSA:

1. New York - 123
2. Chicago - 61
3. Houston - 56
4. Dallas - 41
5. Los Angeles - 35
For a state with so many big metro it's surprising that Houston with only a quarter of the population has over half the number of f 1000 companies.

What other metro are in a similar position? Miami maybe? It looks like the Ohio metro even share the companies.

Edit:
Looks like Tulsa is in a similar position. It has a population of 900k in a state over 3M and has 8 of the state's 14 f1000 companies.

And Charlotte, having 25% of the state's population but 16 out of the state's 27 f1000 companies.

St Louis has less than half the state's population but more than half the companies on the list from Missouri

Last edited by atadytic19; 06-07-2015 at 09:56 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2015, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,937,691 times
Reputation: 7420
Quote:
Originally Posted by atadytic19 View Post
For a state with so many big metro it's surprising that Houston with only a quarter of the population has over half the number of f 500 companies.

What other metro are in a similar position? Miami maybe? It looks like the Ohio metro even share the companies.
Houston has a good number of these companies. Miami maybe, though Florida, even though they have a pretty high population, doesn't have that many companies on the lists proportionally. Unlike Texas who has the most of any state in the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2015, 11:14 AM
 
6,610 posts, read 9,040,017 times
Reputation: 4230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holy Roman Emperor View Post
Because many of the executives don't even live in Atlanta.

For example, CNN. The CEO, executives and the top anchors have all fled Atlanta and moved to New York in the past few years, but the official headquarters still remains Atlanta (for now), for costs savings I presume.

CNN talent drains as anchors and executives desert Atlanta for New York City

Sometimes CEOs move corporations just because they want to live somewhere (i.e. Anheuser Busch and Cadillac recently moved to Manhattan just because their CEOs wanted to live there), but it doesn't make much sense imo. Once you're an executive, it's easy to leave the corporation in a low-tax place and just commute from where you really want to live to headquarters w/ jet.
"Fled" Atlanta? LOL! What a silly thing to say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2015, 11:23 AM
 
6,610 posts, read 9,040,017 times
Reputation: 4230
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Here's a listing of the Fortune 1000 by MSA:

New York - 123
Chicago - 61
Houston - 56
Dallas - 41
Los Angeles - 35
San Jose - 31
Atlanta - 30
Washington DC - 29
San Francisco - 27
Philadelphia - 26
Boston - 24
Denver - 23
Minneapolis - 23
St. Louis - 19
Detroit - 18
Bridgeport, CT - 16
Charlotte - 16
Phoenix - 16
Columbus, OH - 15
Seattle - 15
Cincinnati - 14
Cleveland - 14
Miami - 13
Milwaukee - 13
Pittsburgh - 13
Nashville - 10
Omaha - 10
Richmond, VA - 10
Indianapolis - 9
Kansas City - 9
Las Vegas - 8
Tulsa - 8
Baltimore - 7
Providence - 7
Tampa - 7
Harrisburg, PA - 6
Oklahoma City - 6
Portland - 6
San Antonio - 6
Birmingham - 5
Hartford, CT - 5
Memphis - 5
Toledo - 5
Greensboro/Winston-Salem - 8

*Oh my bad...MSA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top