Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-14-2017, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,645,708 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

The violent crime in each state.



The Most Dangerous City in Every State - 24/7 Wall St.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-14-2017, 11:20 AM
 
23,688 posts, read 9,409,722 times
Reputation: 8653
Albuquerque,New Mexico and Odessa,Texas dont really surprise me.I have spent lots of time in Odessa,Texas but I have never felt unsafe or threatened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2017, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Aurora, CO
8,610 posts, read 14,921,149 times
Reputation: 15424
Aurora has been Colorado's punching bag for decades, but pound-for-pound it's actually safer than Denver proper. No surprise that Pueblo is the true danger zone. It's grit-tastic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2017, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,360,185 times
Reputation: 13299
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluescreen73 View Post
Aurora has been Colorado's punching bag for decades, but pound-for-pound it's actually safer than Denver proper. No surprise that Pueblo is the true danger zone. It's grit-tastic.
I have friends who live in Aurora and it looks like a pretty middle class area. Not the nicest city but definitely doesn't look dangerous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2017, 03:55 PM
 
1,526 posts, read 1,990,629 times
Reputation: 1529
The site is ranking metro areas, not cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2017, 05:59 PM
 
Location: Putnam County TN
730 posts, read 819,638 times
Reputation: 3112
No surprise about Tennessee. I lived in Memphis for five years. My house was burglarized five times, my car was broken into twice, and then it was stolen from right out of my driveway. And I was in a "safe" neighborhood. The thing with Memphis is, even its safe neighborhoods are just a block or two away from crack neighborhoods. And it's a shame, too, because otherwise it's a beautiful city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2017, 06:44 PM
 
Location: Maine
1,285 posts, read 1,398,066 times
Reputation: 1008
I don't buy into violent crime rates. Wichita, KS more violent than Baltimore? Springfield, MA more violent than Philadelphia? I don't buy it. If I was to drop you off somewhere in Baltimore, North Philly, Camden, Chester or Wilmington at night vs Upper Hill in Springfield Massachusetts which would you choose?

I know Springfield, MA fairly well and there is nothing scary about it. Even the east side/Upper Hill area is not scary. What I think it is in Springfield and Wichita is 1) white trash calling police and pressing charges if someone shoves them and 2) police take more calls seriously and people report more on average. It could also be the way these cities classify crimes, if they manipulate them (murders up 50% but violent crime is down 12% see we're doing our job!).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2017, 07:23 PM
 
115 posts, read 97,013 times
Reputation: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeyg2014 View Post
I don't buy into violent crime rates. Wichita, KS more violent than Baltimore? Springfield, MA more violent than Philadelphia? I don't buy it. If I was to drop you off somewhere in Baltimore, North Philly, Camden, Chester or Wilmington at night vs Upper Hill in Springfield Massachusetts which would you choose?

I know Springfield, MA fairly well and there is nothing scary about it. Even the east side/Upper Hill area is not scary. What I think it is in Springfield and Wichita is 1) white trash calling police and pressing charges if someone shoves them and 2) police take more calls seriously and people report more on average. It could also be the way these cities classify crimes, if they manipulate them (murders up 50% but violent crime is down 12% see we're doing our job!).
You don't buy into crime rates, but only when it fits your stereotype? That makes no sense.

Anyhow, you need a Camden update. Crime rate has dropped considerably. Only 8 murders in Camden as of 6/6/17.

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BPt111 View Post
Buffalo, NY 24
Albany, NY 2
Newburgh , NY 3
Syracuse, NY 6
Rochester, NY 8
Binghamton, NY 3
Yonkers, NY 3
Utica, NY 2
Poughkeepsie, NY 1
Niagara Falls, NY 2
Mount Vernon, NY 2
Schenectady, NY 1
New Rochelle and White Plains NY 0

Newark, NJ 20---same time last year was 39
Paterson, NJ 16
Jersey City, NJ 10
Atlantic city, NJ 9
Camden, NJ 8---same time last year it was 26
Millville 3
Vineland 3
East Orange, NJ 3
Elizabeth, NJ 3
Irvington, NJ 3
Plainfield, NJ 3
Asbury Park 1
Bridgeton 1
http://www.courierpostonline.com/sto...ove/100845048/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2017, 07:34 PM
 
Location: Maine
1,285 posts, read 1,398,066 times
Reputation: 1008
Quote:
Originally Posted by GarbanzoBeans View Post
You don't buy into crime rates, but only when it fits your stereotype? That makes no sense.

Anyhow, you need a Camden update. Crime rate has dropped considerably. Only 8 murders in Camden as of 6/6/17.

Crime numbers plummet in Camden
That's still more homicides than Springfield has so far this year and Springfield is much larger. Camden even had as many homicides as Boston did last year.

And it could just be a quiet start to the year. Camden had 25 homicides in 2001, 49 in 2004, 34 in 2009, 67 in 2012, 44 last year, etc. It's by no means a trend based on 5 months of data. Camden has traditionally fluctuated. Camden will still probably finish the year with more homicides than Springfield has had any year this century.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2017, 08:25 PM
 
Location: Katy,Texas
6,476 posts, read 4,087,945 times
Reputation: 4522
It isn't called variation. Just because Philadelphia varies from really dangerous hoods to tons of really safe areas means the entire philly area is safer than Springfield. Same with Baltimore. The city proper might be crime filled but the area 70% of the metro lives is mostly nice suburban neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top