Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: If you had to pick one?
Des Moines, Iowa 7 6.42%
Indianapolis, Indiana 18 16.51%
Madison, Wisconsin 45 41.28%
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 15 13.76%
Omaha, Nebraska 14 12.84%
Sioux Falls, South Dakota 8 7.34%
Wichita, Kansas 2 1.83%
Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2008, 10:12 PM
 
Location: Iowa, Des Moines Metro
2,072 posts, read 5,416,603 times
Reputation: 1112

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Go Ne View Post
Oh no the tyrant, the evil person, whowever voted for Wichita???!!!!!
I know right. I've been waiting for days for someone to hold hands with Wichita.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2008, 10:24 PM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,407 posts, read 46,581,861 times
Reputation: 19549
Someone voted for Wichita, eh?

My number one choice is Madison.
My number two choice is Des Moines.
In general I prefer Midwest cities over Great Plains cities any day of the week!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2008, 10:29 PM
 
Location: Iowa, Des Moines Metro
2,072 posts, read 5,416,603 times
Reputation: 1112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plains10 View Post
Someone voted for Wichita, eh?

My number one choice is Madison.
My number two choice is Des Moines.
In general I prefer Midwest cities over Great Plains cities any day of the week!!!
The line of separation from the Midwest into the Great Plains confuses me. Where do you draw it? Cities like Omaha and Des Moines aren't very similar in culture or scenery to cities like Grand Rapids, MI or Dayton, OH.. at least to me. (I'm so hung up on this lately. )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2008, 10:33 PM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,407 posts, read 46,581,861 times
Reputation: 19549
Quote:
Originally Posted by metro223 View Post
The line of separation from the Midwest into the Great Plains confuses me. Where do you draw it? Cities like Omaha and Des Moines aren't comparable to Grand Rapids, MI or Dayton, OH to me. (I'm so hung up on this lately. )
Generally, I consider the Great Plains states to be the Dakotas, Nebraska, and Kansas with an extension a little further east into Iowa, western MN and northwest MO. The Midwest core I would defiine as the cornbelt. This includes most of Iowa, southern MN, southern WI, northern and central IL, and northern and central IN. The Great Lakes would dictate the eastern portion of the Midwest with such cities as Detroit, Cleveland, Toledo, Grand Rapids, Saginaw, Muskegon, South Bend, Fort Wayne, Chicago, and Milwaukee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2008, 10:44 PM
 
Location: Iowa, Des Moines Metro
2,072 posts, read 5,416,603 times
Reputation: 1112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plains10 View Post
Generally, I consider the Great Plains states to be the Dakotas, Nebraska, and Kansas with an extension a little further east into Iowa, western MN and northwest MO. The Midwest core I would defiine as the cornbelt. This includes most of Iowa, southern MN, southern WI, northern and central IL, and northern and central IN. The Great Lakes would dictate the eastern portion of the Midwest with such cities as Detroit, Cleveland, Toledo, Grand Rapids, Saginaw, Muskegon, South Bend, Fort Wayne, Chicago, and Milwaukee.
I guess I consider the Great Plains to be the arid rainshadow of the rockies, which doesn't get started until out in Western Nebraska. Otherwise Central and Eastern Nebraska and Western and Central Iowa have the same natural vegetation - and that is tallgrass prairie. (Now mostly farmland.)

I'm going nowhere with this. I'm just trying to prove and identify a difference between the Great Lakes states and the states west of that - but before the Great Plains. (That's my thesis )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2008, 12:31 AM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,407 posts, read 46,581,861 times
Reputation: 19549
Quote:
Originally Posted by metro223 View Post
I guess I consider the Great Plains to be the arid rainshadow of the rockies, which doesn't get started until out in Western Nebraska. Otherwise Central and Eastern Nebraska and Western and Central Iowa have the same natural vegetation - and that is tallgrass prairie. (Now mostly farmland.)

I'm going nowhere with this. I'm just trying to prove and identify a difference between the Great Lakes states and the states west of that - but before the Great Plains. (That's my thesis )
The main difference between the Great Plains and the Midwest is climate, landscape, and political attitudes. The Great Plains is a lot drier and warmer overall compared with the Midwest during most seasons. Wheat is the dominant crop in the Great Plains, and much of the corn has to be irrigated in order to grow well. Population density in most of the rural areas in the Great Plains is much lower compared with the Midwest. Many counties in the Great Plains are classified as "frontier" because they have seven or fewer people per square mile. The Great Plains generally has more issues with water supply due to the decline of the Ogallala Aquifer in several areas. This has been a concern over portions of Kansas and Texas.
The Midwest is the huge corn and soybean belt in terms of agriculture. The rainfall is more than adequate during the growing season to support those type of crops without having to use irrigation like their neighbors further west. The Midwest generally has much higher levels of humidity during the summer compared with the Great Plains. Part of this is due to the fact that the corn evapotranspires during the growing season. (Corn adds to the humidity values).
In terms of political attitudes the two regions could not be more different. The Great Plains votes typically Republican, and the rural areas tend to be extremely conservative, and not quite as open to change. The rural Midwest is more mixed with more of an equal balance between Republican and Democratic politicians. The bigger cities in the Great Lakes tend to vote more heavily Democratic mainly due to the historically strong presence of unions of all types. (This is especially true in cities like Detroit, Cleveland, and Chicago).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2008, 08:24 AM
 
423 posts, read 1,532,828 times
Reputation: 275
I'd rule out both Des Moines, Iowa, Madison, Wisconsin because of the HP poor reputation for rip off traffic tickets
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2008, 08:27 AM
 
Location: TwilightZone
5,296 posts, read 6,474,352 times
Reputation: 1031
I picked Wichita Kansas with Oklahoma running a close second.
Even though the weather in any of those areas is not that good,I'd pick those places because of the people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2008, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Iowa, Des Moines Metro
2,072 posts, read 5,416,603 times
Reputation: 1112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plains10 View Post
The main difference between the Great Plains and the Midwest is climate, landscape, and political attitudes. The Great Plains is a lot drier and warmer overall compared with the Midwest during most seasons. Wheat is the dominant crop in the Great Plains, and much of the corn has to be irrigated in order to grow well. Population density in most of the rural areas in the Great Plains is much lower compared with the Midwest. Many counties in the Great Plains are classified as "frontier" because they have seven or fewer people per square mile. The Great Plains generally has more issues with water supply due to the decline of the Ogallala Aquifer in several areas. This has been a concern over portions of Kansas and Texas.
The Midwest is the huge corn and soybean belt in terms of agriculture. The rainfall is more than adequate during the growing season to support those type of crops without having to use irrigation like their neighbors further west. The Midwest generally has much higher levels of humidity during the summer compared with the Great Plains. Part of this is due to the fact that the corn evapotranspires during the growing season. (Corn adds to the humidity values).
In terms of political attitudes the two regions could not be more different. The Great Plains votes typically Republican, and the rural areas tend to be extremely conservative, and not quite as open to change. The rural Midwest is more mixed with more of an equal balance between Republican and Democratic politicians. The bigger cities in the Great Lakes tend to vote more heavily Democratic mainly due to the historically strong presence of unions of all types. (This is especially true in cities like Detroit, Cleveland, and Chicago).
Thank you for this explanation. I did know about the Ogallala aquifer being used up too quickly. It would be fine if it wasn't used at such a fast rate because it will replenish itself, people just aren't allowing it to do so. Are there things being done to preserve the aquifer as well as revitalize it? I guess it makes sense that the area was once considered the 'Great American Desert.'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2008, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Des Moines, IA
1,744 posts, read 7,260,609 times
Reputation: 1239
Quote:
Originally Posted by OgleCo View Post
Actually, dawnxman, Madison, Wisconsin is larger than Des Moines, Iowa. Des Moines has 195K and Madison 230K.

.

'tis true, but Des Moines is a larger metro area than Madison.

Off the top of my head, here's how the cities would rank for metro population:

Indy
OKC
Omaha
Des Moines
Wichita
Madison
Sioux Falls

Des Moines excluded, like many others I'd pick Madison. I've only heard good things about it and I kind of like the Northern culture. Omaha would go second, I know it's a decent place that offers a lot of things. Indy would probably be third, followed by OKC, Sioux Falls and Wichita.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top